Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21929846›Full record

Trial reportPsychological medicine2012

Depression symptom dimensions as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome: replicable evidence for interest-activity symptoms.

R Uher, R H Perlis, N Henigsberg, A Zobel, M Rietschel, O Mors, J Hauser, M Z Dernovsek, D Souery, M Bajs and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05866575 (Prediction of the Therapeutic Response in Depression Based on an Early Neuro-computational Modeling Assessment of Motivation), which is not on this map. Cited by 186 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05866575 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of the Therapeutic Response in Depression Based on an Early Neuro-computational Modeling Assessment of Motivation

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier St AnneRan2023 to 2026Enrolled136ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsescitalopram, vortioxetine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 417 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

R UherMRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK. rudolf.uher@kcl.ac.uk
R H Perlis
N Henigsberg
A Zobel
M Rietschel
O Mors
J Hauser
M Z Dernovsek
D Souery
M Bajs
W Maier
K J Aitchison
A Farmer
P McGuffin
King's College London · GBUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Zagreb · HRAarhus University Hospital · DKCenter for Human Genetics · USCentral Institute of Mental Health · DEPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Psychiatric Hospital · SI

Funding

Building a Risk Stratification Model for Treatment Resistance in Major DepressiveR01MH086026 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PERLIS, ROY H. · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION-278990003N01MH090003 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · 1999 to 2003
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH086026NIMH NIH HHS N01 MH090003NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom dimensions have not yet been comprehensively tested as predictors of the substantial heterogeneity in outcomes of antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder.

methodWe tested nine symptom dimensions derived from a previously published factor analysis of depression rating scales as predictors of outcome in 811 adults with moderate to severe depression treated with flexibly dosed escitalopram or nortriptyline in Genome-based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP). The effects of symptom dimensions were tested in mixed-effect regression models that controlled for overall initial depression severity, age, sex and recruitment centre. Significant results were tested for replicability in 3637 adult out-patients with non-psychotic major depression treated with citalopram in level I of Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D).

resultsThe interest-activity symptom dimension (reflecting low interest, reduced activity, indecisiveness and lack of enjoyment) at baseline strongly predicted poor treatment outcome in GENDEP, irrespective of overall depression severity, antidepressant type and outcome measure used. The prediction of poor treatment outcome by the interest-activity dimension was robustly replicated in STAR*D, independent of a comprehensive list of baseline covariates.

conclusionsLoss of interest, diminished activity and inability to make decisions predict poor outcome of antidepressant treatment even after adjustment for overall depression severity and other clinical covariates. The prominence of such symptoms may require additional treatment strategies and should be accounted for in future investigations of antidepressant response.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAffectAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicCitalopramCognitionEuropeFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleNortriptylinePredictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicCitalopramNortriptyline

Identifiers

PMID21929846
PMCPMC3787526
OpenAlexW2034528843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.