ArticleBiology direct2011
Families of transposable elements, population structure and the origin of species.
Article in Biology direct, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- A reference-free pipeline for detecting shared transposable elements from pan-genomes to retrace their dynamics in a species.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly of Eden's Whale Clarifies the Taxonomy and Speciation of Bryde's Whale Complex.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Deciphering octoploid strawberry evolution with serial LTR similarity matrices for subgenome partition.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Island size shapes genomic diversity in a great speciator (Aves:Biology letters · 2025Article
- Review
- Review
- Comparative analysis of bats and rodents' genomes suggests a relation between non-LTR retrotransposons, cancer incidence, and ageing.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Insights into mammalian TE diversity through the curation of 248 genome assemblies.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Distinct regulatory pathways contribute to dynamic CHH methylation patterns in transposable elements throughoutFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Transposable Elements in Bats Show Differential Accumulation Patterns Determined by Class and Functionality.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative repeatome analysis reveals new evidence on genome evolution in wild diploid Arachis (Fabaceae) species.Planta · 2022Article
- Linked-Read Sequencing of Eight Falcons Reveals a Unique Genomic Architecture in Flux.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- LINE-1 and SINE-B1 mapping and genome diversification inLife science alliance · 2022Article
- Patterns of piRNA Regulation in Drosophila Revealed through Transposable Element Clade Inference.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Repeatome-Based Phylogenetics in Pelargonium Section Ciconium (Sweet) Harvey.Genome biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Aiming off the target: recycling target capture sequencing reads for investigating repetitive DNA.Annals of botany · 2021Article
- Bioinformatics and Machine Learning Approaches to Understand the Regulation of Mobile Genetic Elements.Biology · 2021Review
- Transposons-Based Clonal Diversity in Trematode Involves Parts of CR1 (LINE) in Eu- and Heterochromatin.Genes · 2021Article
- The Structural, Functional and Evolutionary Impact of Transposable Elements in Eukaryotes.Genes · 2021Review
- Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEukaryotic genomes harbor diverse families of repetitive DNA derived from transposable elements (TEs) that are able to replicate and insert into genomic DNA. The biological role of TEs remains unclear, although they have profound mutagenic impact on eukaryotic genomes and the origin of repetitive families often correlates with speciation events. We present a new hypothesis to explain the observed correlations based on classical concepts of population genetics. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The main thesis presented in this paper is that the TE-derived repetitive families originate primarily by genetic drift in small populations derived mostly by subdivisions of large populations into subpopulations. We outline the potential impact of the emerging repetitive families on genetic diversification of different subpopulations, and discuss implications of such diversification for the origin of new species. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: Several testable predictions of the hypothesis are examined. First, we focus on the prediction that the number of diverse families of TEs fixed in a representative genome of a particular species positively correlates with the cumulative number of subpopulations (demes) in the historical metapopulation from which the species has emerged. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that human AluYa5 and AluYb8 families might have originated in separate proto-human subpopulations. We also revisit prior evidence linking the origin of repetitive families to mammalian phylogeny and present additional evidence linking repetitive families to speciation based on mammalian taxonomy. Finally, we discuss evidence that mammalian orders represented by the largest numbers of species may be subject to relatively recent population subdivisions and speciation events. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis implies that subdivision of a population into small subpopulations is the major step in the origin of new families of TEs as well as of new species. The origin of new subpopulations is likely to be driven by the availability of new biological niches, consistent with the hypothesis of punctuated equilibria. The hypothesis also has implications for the ongoing debate on the role of genetic drift in genome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.