ArticleFuture cardiology2011
Impact of oral chronic administration of sildenafil in children and young adults after the Fontan operation.
Article in Future cardiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Sildenafil on Pressure-Volume Loop Measures of Ventricular Function in Fontan Patients.Pediatric cardiology · 2016Trial
- Cardiac Imaging in Patients After Fontan Palliation: Which Test and When?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Drug Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension in Children.Paediatric drugs · 2020Review
- Heart failure in single right ventricle congenital heart disease: physiological and molecular considerations.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Review
- Current challenges in pediatric pulmonary hypertension.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2013Review
- The efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasodilators in patients with Fontan circulation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Pulmonary circulationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of: Goldberg DJ, French B, McBride MG et al. Impact of oral sildenafil on exercise performance in children and young adults after the Fontan operation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Circulation 123, 1185-1193 (2011). After the Fontan operation, patients often have decreased exercise capacity as a result of an inability to increase cardiac output during exercise. Evidence exists that limitation in ventricular preload, related to pulmonary artery resistance plays an important role. A drug able to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance might increase transpulmonary flow and ventricular preload, therefore improving cardiac output and exercise performance. The article by Goldberg et al. is the first randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the impact of the phosphodiestarase-5 inhibitor sildenafil on exercise performance in patients after they have received the Fontan operation. The study included 28 patients with a mean age of 14.9 years. In this population, 6 weeks of sildenafil administration significantly improved ventilatory efficiency. The authors also noted an increase in exercise capacity during submaximal exercise, after 6 weeks of sildenafil in those patients with single left or mixed ventricular morphology and in those with more advanced heart failure (baseline serum brain natriuretic peptide level >100 pg/ml). The drug was well tolerated with no significant side effects. These findings suggest that sildenafil may play a role in improving exercise performance and exercise-induced breathlessness in children and young adults with single-ventricle physiology after the Fontan operation. Additional data on the possible benefit in terms of long-term clinical outcome and safety of sildenafil in this setting are needed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.