ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Use of addictive anxiolytics and hypnotics in a national cohort of incident users in Norway.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between initial benzodiazepine prescribing patterns and time to benzodiazepine discontinuation: A population-based retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Benzodiazepine Use in Patients Attending a Community Mental Health Team in Scotland: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025Article
- New users of anxiolytics and sedatives in Sweden-Drug type, doses, prescribers' characteristics, and psychiatric comorbidity in more than 750,000 patients.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2024Article
- Factors associated with long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drug use across the lifespan and 5-year temporal trajectories among incident users: a Swedish nationwide register-based study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2023Article
- Article
- Incidence of and Characteristics Associated With Long-term Benzodiazepine Use in Finland.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Chronic hypnotic use at 10 years-does the brand matter?European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- General practitioners' prescriptions of benzodiazepines, Z-hypnotics and opioid analgesics for elderly patients during direct and indirect contacts. A cross-sectional, observational study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2018Observational
- Risk of hip fracture among older people using anxiolytic and hypnotic drugs: a nationwide prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine (1) incidence rates for treatment with addictive anxiolytics and hypnotics in Norway, (2) the proportions initiated by general practitioners (GPs), psychiatrists, and other physicians, and (3) the course of the treatment among incident users during a 3.5 year follow-up period.
methodData on all prescriptions of anxiolytics (ATC code N05B) and hypnotics (N05C) dispensed to the general population from 1 January 2004 to 31 August 2009 were extracted from the Norwegian Prescription Database and merged with data about GPs from the Norwegian Regular General Practitioner Scheme.
resultsOne-year incidence rates per 1,000 inhabitants were 18.2 for anxiolytics, 24.5 for hypnotics, and 35.4 for anxiolytics and hypnotics combined. GPs and psychiatrists initiated the treatment to 75.4 and 2.4%, respectively. Only 30.8% received short-term treatment as recommended. Long-term use (11.8%) and heavy use (1.4%) were most common for treatments initiated by a GP, but the risk both of long-term and of heavy use was highest for patients initially treated by a psychiatrist. The amount redeemed during the first quarter was the strongest predictor of long-term use and of heavy use. However, even during the quarter with highest drug consumption, 81.5% of the patients received <1 DDD/day.
conclusionsThis study indicates that physicians' prescribing strategy towards initial users is crucial in order to prevent inappropriate drug use. There is a need to implement relevant guidelines and systems for structured clinical audits in general practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.