Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21927880›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2012

The importance of physician-patient relationship for improvement of adherence to long-term therapy: data of survey in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients with mild and moderate disability.

Tatiana Koudriavtseva, Emanuela Onesti, Isabella Fernanda Pestalozza, Isabella Sperduti, Bruno Jandolo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Listening to the neurological teams for multiple sclerosis: the SMART project.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Mapping the Status of Healthcare Improvement Science through a Narrative Review in Six European Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tatiana KoudriavtsevaDepartment of Neurosciences, Neurology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. koudriavtseva@ifo.it
Emanuela Onesti
Isabella Fernanda Pestalozza
Isabella Sperduti
Bruno Jandolo
National Cancer Institute · MYOspedale Sandro Pertini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient involvement in the improvement of health care is important for the best long-term treatment outcomes. Our objective is to assess patient satisfaction with offered care service and to identify parameters which influence the adherence to long-term therapy. A prospective single-center study based on the administration of a structured interview to multiple sclerosis (MS) patients attending our MS Centre with mild and moderate disabilities. The interview regarding clinical parameters, quality of life and satisfaction of care service was structured in three parts with multiple-choice answers to close- or open-ended questions. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by the concordance between the level of patient attention and judgment regarding the services offered. The impact of all variables on the adherence to therapy and on the perceived utility of treatment was evaluated. The concordance between patient attention and judgment on health care services resulted statistically significant for almost all parameters. The perceived utility of treatment was significantly correlated to patients feeling confident in the clinical staff, to their perception of being involved in therapeutic decision (p<0.05), and associated to therapy adherence (p=0.0001). In a multivariate model, the adherence to therapy resulted associated to possibility of choosing the physician (p=0.037) and inversely to therapy duration (p=0.001). Our conclusion reveals that, to improve the adherence to long-term therapy and the perceived utility of treatment, a particular attention should be devoted to physician-patient relationship.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalItalyMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeStatistics, NonparametricSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21927880
OpenAlexW1984161216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.