Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21927036›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2012

Respiratory failure in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT--a randomized trial on early non-invasive ventilation based on standard care hematology wards.

M Wermke, S Schiemanck, G Höffken, G Ehninger, M Bornhäuser, T Illmer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021.Journal of intensive care · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M WermkeMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
S Schiemanck
G Höffken
G Ehninger
M Bornhäuser
T Illmer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognosis of patients suffering from respiratory failure (RF) after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) is poor. However, early treatment for using non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may be of benefit. We conducted a randomized trial to prove the impact of early NIV in patients in the early post-transplant period. A total of 526 patients undergoing HSCT in a single center were monitored for signs of RF. Patients with RF were enrolled into either treatment arm A (oxygen supply only) or treatment arm B (oxygen+intermittent NIV). RF had to be diagnosed in 86 patients (16%). RF was an independent risk factor for both short-term (100 day mortality/ OR 2.76; P<0.001) and long-term survival (OR 1.57; P<0.01). Although early RF treatment with NIV was associated with a decreased rate of failure to achieve sufficient oxygenation (39% in arm A vs 24% in arm B, P=0.17), neither intensive care unit admission rate, nor need for intubation or survival parameters were affected by the treatment strategy. An early interventional strategy using NIV was not associated with improvement of the prognosis of the patients. The limited influence of NIV may be related to the study design allowing for switching of treatment in case of unsatisfactory efficacy.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationRespiration, ArtificialAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDisease-Free SurvivalHematologic NeoplasmsHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedOxygenRespiratory InsufficiencySurvival RateOxygen

Identifiers

PMID21927036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.