Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21927034›Full record

GuidelineBone marrow transplantation2012

ECIL recommendations for the use of biological markers for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases in leukemic patients and hematopoietic SCT recipients.

O Marchetti, F Lamoth, M Mikulska, C Viscoli, P Verweij, S Bretagne, European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) Laboratory Working Groups

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 275 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Primers OPF-01, P54, and 1253 to IdentifyPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Acute graft-versus-host disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  12. Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

O MarchettiInfectious Diseases Service, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
F Lamoth
M Mikulska
C Viscoli
P Verweij
S Bretagne
European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL) Laboratory Working Groups
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CHHôpital Albert-Chenevier · FRRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust 090532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As culture-based methods for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) in leukemia and hematopoietic SCT patients have limited performance, non-culture methods are increasingly being used. The third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-3) meeting aimed at establishing evidence-based recommendations for the use of biological tests in adult patients, based on the grading system of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. The following biomarkers were investigated as screening tests: galactomannan (GM) for invasive aspergillosis (IA); β-glucan (BG) for invasive candidiasis (IC) and IA; Cryptococcus Ag for cryptococcosis; mannan (Mn) Ag/anti-mannan (A-Mn) Ab for IC, and PCR for IA. Testing for GM, Cryptococcus Ag and BG are included in the revised EORTC/MSG (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group) consensus definitions for IFD. Strong evidence supports the use of GM in serum (A II), and Cryptococcus Ag in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (A II). Evidence is moderate for BG detection in serum (B II), and the combined Mn/A-Mn testing in serum for hepatosplenic candidiasis (B III) and candidemia (C II). No recommendations were formulated for the use of PCR owing to a lack of standardization and clinical validation. Clinical utility of these markers for the early management of IFD should be further assessed in prospective randomized interventional studies.

Indexed as

Antigens, Fungalbeta-GlucansHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMannansMycosesBiomarkersCongresses as TopicEuropean UnionGalactoseLeukemiaTransplantation, HomologousAntigens, Fungalbeta-GlucansBiomarkersgalactomannanGalactoseMannans

Identifiers

PMID21927034
OpenAlexW2151209623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.