Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21926592›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2012

Osmolar therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Tellen D Bennett, Kimberly D Statler, E Kent Korgenski, Susan L Bratton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Hyperosmolar therapy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a retrospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Article
  12. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Infants and Young Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2016
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric head injury: a pain for the emergency physician?Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2015
    Review
  15. Pediatric neurotrauma.International journal of critical illness and injury science · 2014
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Fluid management in the critically ill child.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. New trends in hyperosmolar therapy?Current opinion in critical care · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tellen D BennettUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. tell.bennett@hsc.utah.edu
Kimberly D Statler
E Kent Korgenski
Susan L Bratton
University of Utah · US

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
Mentored Scholars Program for Translational Comparative Effectiveness ResearchKM1CA156723 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BYINGTON, CARRIE L. · 2010 to 2010
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067NCI NIH HHS 1KM1CA156723NCI NIH HHS KM1 CA156723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe patterns of use for mannitol and hypertonic saline in children with traumatic brain injury, to evaluate any potential associations between hypertonic saline and mannitol use and patient demographic, injury, and treatment hospital characteristics, and to determine whether the 2003 guidelines for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury impacted clinical practice regarding osmolar therapy.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingPediatric Health Information System database, January, 2001 to December, 2008. PATIENTS: Children (age <18 yrs) with traumatic brain injury and head/neck Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3 who received mechanical ventilation and intensive care.

interventions: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsThe primary outcome was hospital billing for parenteral hypertonic saline and mannitol use, by day of service. Overall, 33% (2,069 of 6,238) of the patients received hypertonic saline, and 40% (2,500 of 6,238) received mannitol. Of the 1,854 patients who received hypertonic saline or mannitol for ≥ 2 days in the first week of therapy, 29% did not have intracranial pressure monitoring. After adjustment for hospital-level variation, primary insurance payer, and overall injury severity, use of both drugs was independently associated with older patient age, intracranial hemorrhage (other than epidural), skull fracture, and higher head/neck injury severity. Hypertonic saline use increased and mannitol use decreased with publication of the 2003 guidelines, and these trends continued through 2008.

conclusionsHypertonic saline and mannitol are used less in infants than in older children. The patient-level and hospital-level variation in osmolar therapy use and the substantial amount of sustained osmolar therapy without intracranial pressure monitoring suggest opportunities to improve the quality of pediatric traumatic brain injury care. With limited high-quality evidence available, published expert guidelines appear to significantly impact clinical practice in this area.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsBrain InjuriesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFluid TherapyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInjury Severity ScoreIntracranial PressureMaleMannitolRetrospective StudiesSaline Solution, HypertonicMannitolSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID21926592
PMCPMC3242905
OpenAlexW1995137492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.