ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2012
Identifying provider beliefs related to contingency management adoption using the contingency management beliefs questionnaire.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585203 (Contingency Management for Recovery Oriented Activities at Recovery Houses), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Contingency Management for Recovery Oriented Activities at Recovery Houses
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contingency management for treatment attendance: A meta-analysis.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Pooled it
- Long-term efficacy of contingency management treatment based on objective indicators of abstinence from illicit substance use up to 1 year following treatment: A meta-analysis.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Project MIMIC (Maximizing Implementation of Motivational Incentives in Clinics): results of a 28-site cluster-randomized type 3 hybrid trial.Implementation science : IS · 2025Trial
- Contingency Management and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Support Services (CoMPASS): A hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to promote HIV risk reduction among people who inject drugs.Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Trial
- Remotely administered incentive-based treatment for alcohol use disorder with participant-funded incentives is effective but less accessible to low-income participants.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- A randomized trial of contingency management reinforcing attendance at treatment: Do duration and timing of reinforcement matter?Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2018Trial
- Treatment Satisfaction in a Randomized Clinical Trial of mHealth Smoking Abstinence Reinforcement.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2017Trial
- An implementation-focused process evaluation of an incentive intervention effectiveness trial in substance use disorders clinics at two Veterans Health Administration medical centers.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2014Trial
- Income received during treatment does not affect response to contingency management treatments in cocaine-dependent outpatients.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2013Trial
- Rationale, design and methods of theBMJ open · 2026Article
- Multi-method Analysis of Implementation Determinants and Strategies to Support the Implementation of Contingency Management for Methamphetamine Use in an HIV Care Setting.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Review
- Implementing incentives in family medicine for opioid use disorder treatment: a qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Addiction specialists' perspectives on digital contingency management and its role within UK drug and alcohol services: A qualitative exploration.Drug and alcohol review · 2025Article
- Implementing contingency management in family medicine: A qualitative inquiry on provider and patient preferences for a low magnitude reward program compatible with buprenorphine treatment.Research square · 2025Article
- Using the IFASIS (Inventory of Factors Affecting Successful Implementation and Sustainment) to advance context-specific and generalizable knowledge of implementation determinants: case study of a digital contingency management platform.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Readiness to implement contingency management to promote PrEP initiation and adherence among people who inject drugs: results from a multi-site implementation survey.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2024Article
- Examining the impact of low magnitude incentives in contingency management protocols: Non-engagement in Petry et al. 2004.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024Article
- Article
- Psychotherapies in opioid use disorder: toward a step-care model.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContingency management (CM) is a widely recognized empirically-supported addiction treatment; however, dissemination and adoption of CM into routine clinical practice has been slow. Assessment of beliefs about CM may highlight key barriers and facilitators of adoption and inform dissemination efforts. In the present study, we developed a 35-item questionnaire (contingency management beliefs questionnaire; CMBQ) assessing CM beliefs and examined the relation of these beliefs to clinician characteristics and clinical practices.
methodsThe web-based study was completed by 617 substance abuse treatment providers. We examined the factor structure using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) in a randomly selected half-sample (n=318) and evaluated the generalizability of the solution using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the second half-sample (n=299).
resultsEFA results suggested a 3-factor solution with 32 items retained; factors represented general barriers, training-related barriers, and pro-CM items. CFA results supported the solution, and reliability was good within each half-sample (α=0.88 and 0.90). Therapeutic approach, years experience in addictions field, perception of CM's research support, prior CM training, and CM adoption interest were significantly associated with the factors.
conclusionsOverall, participants viewed CM favorably yet endorsed barriers, indicating a need for more extensive and targeted response to the most common misperceptions in dissemination efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.