Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21924649›Full record

ReviewUrologic oncology2013

When urothelial differentiation pathways go wrong: implications for bladder cancer development and progression.

David J DeGraff, Justin M Cates, Joshua R Mauney, Peter E Clark, Robert J Matusik, Rosalyn M Adam

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologic oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sleeping beauty: awakening urothelium from its slumber.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J DeGraffDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. david.degraff@vanderbilt.edu
Justin M Cates
Joshua R Mauney
Peter E Clark
Robert J Matusik
Rosalyn M Adam
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGYT32DK007563 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Richard M O'Brien · 1988 to 2026
$15.9M
Integrated Biological Systems Training in OncologyT32CA119925 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Vivian Gama, William Patrick Tansey · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1 T32 CA119925NCI NIH HHS T32 CA119925NIDDK NIH HHS 5 T32 DK007563-21NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation is defined as the ability of a cell to acquire full functional behavior. For instance, the function of bladder urothelium is to act as a barrier to the diffusion of solutes into or out of the urine after excretion by the kidney. The urothelium also serves to protect the detrusor muscle from toxins present in stored urine. A major event in the initiation and progression of bladder cancer is loss of urothelial differentiation. This is important because less differentiated urothelial tumors (higher histologic tumor grade) are typically associated with increased biologic and clinical aggressiveness. The differentiation status of urothelial carcinomas can be assessed by histopathologic examination and is reflected in the assignment of a histologic grade (low-grade or high-grade). Although typically limited to morphologic evaluation in most routine diagnostic practices, tumor grade can also be assessed using biochemical markers. Indeed, current pathological analysis of tumor specimens is increasingly reliant on molecular phenotyping. Thus, high priorities for bladder cancer research include identification of (1) biomarkers that will enable the identification of high grade T1 tumors that pose the most threat and require the most aggressive treatment; (2) biomarkers that predict the likelihood that a low grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage pTa bladder tumor will progress into an invasive carcinoma with metastatic potential; (3) biomarkers that indicate which pTa tumors are most likely to recur, thus enabling clinicians to prospectively identify patients who require aggressive treatment; and (4) how these markers might contribute to biological processes that underlie tumor progression and metastasis, potentially through loss of terminal differentiation. This review will discuss the proteins associated with urothelial cell differentiation, with a focus on those implicated in bladder cancer, and other proteins that may be involved in neoplastic progression. It is hoped that ongoing discoveries associated with the study of these differentiation-promoting proteins can be translated into the clinic to positively impact patient care.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCell DifferentiationDisease ProgressionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaHumansMusclesNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPPAR gammaSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsTretinoinUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkers, TumorFOXA1 protein, humanHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaPPAR gammaTranscription FactorsTretinoinBladder cancerDifferentiationFOXA1PPARγRetinoic acidTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID21924649
PMCPMC4886548
OpenAlexW2045104540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.