Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21923844›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2011

A healthy bladder: a consensus statement.

E S Lukacz, C Sampselle, M Gray, S Macdiarmid, M Rosenberg, P Ellsworth, M H Palmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Automated Point-of-Care Bladder Pressure and Volume Measurement Device for Urodynamic Monitoring.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Dynamic Ultrasound Phantom with Tissue-Mimicking Mechanical and Acoustic Properties.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Proof-of-Concept of Microwave-Based Bladder State Detection Using Realistic Pelvic Models.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

E S LukaczUniversity of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92037, USA. elukacz@ucsd.edu
C Sampselle
M Gray
S Macdiarmid
M Rosenberg
P Ellsworth
M H Palmer
Brown University · USMercy Health · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A panel of experts in urology, urogynecology, nursing, and behavioral therapy convened in 2010 to discuss the importance of a healthy bladder on overall health. They determined that a consensus statement was necessary to raise awareness among the general public, healthcare providers, payors, and policymakers, with the goals of minimizing the impact of poor bladder health and stimulating primary prevention of bladder conditions. In this statement, 'healthy' bladder function is described, as well as internal and external factors that influence bladder health. It is suggested that primary prevention strategies should be aimed at providing education regarding normal lower urinary tract structures and functioning to the public, including patients and healthcare providers. This education may promote the achievement of optimal bladder health by increasing healthy bladder habits and behaviors, awareness of risk factors, healthcare seeking, and clinician engagement and reducing stigma and other barriers to treatment. Promoting optimal bladder health may reduce the personal, societal and economic impact of bladder conditions, including anxiety and depression and costs associated with conditions or diseases and their treatment. While adopting healthy bladder habits and behaviors and behaviors may improve or maintain bladder health, it is important to recognize that certain symptoms may indicate the presence of conditions that require medical attention; many bladder conditions are treatable with a range of options for most bladder conditions. Lastly, the authors propose clinical directives based on persuasive and convergent research to improve and maintain bladder health. The authors hope that this statement will lead to promotion and achievement of optimal bladder health, which may improve overall health and help minimize the effects of bladder conditions on the public, healthcare professionals, educators, employers, and payors. The advisors are in consensus regarding the recommendations for improving and maintaining bladder health presented herein.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttitude to HealthConsensusCost of IllnessDietHealth PromotionHumansHygieneMiddle AgedPelvic FloorPrevalenceUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrinary Tract InfectionsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21923844
PMCPMC3206217
OpenAlexW2162020391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.