Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21923820›Full record

ReviewVeterinary ophthalmology2011

Feline glaucoma--a comprehensive review.

Gillian J McLellan, Paul E Miller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Glaucoma in a Siberian Tiger (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modeling complex age-related eye disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bilateral anterior segment dysgenesis in a 7-week-old domestic shorthaired cat.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gillian J McLellanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA. mclellan@vetmed.wisc.edu
Paul E Miller
Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW Vision Research Core - Administrative CoreP30EY016665 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ROBERT W NICKELLS · 2005 to 2026
$12.6M
Structural and Functional Characterization of a Novel Model for Glaucoma ResearchK08EY018609 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCLELLAN, GILLIAN JANE · 2008 to 2012
$860k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY018609NEI NIH HHS K08EY018609NEI NIH HHS P30 EY016665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cats with glaucoma typically present late in the course of disease. It is likely that glaucoma in cats is under-diagnosed due to its insidious onset and gradual progression, as well as limitations of some commonly used tonometers in this species. Treatment of glaucoma in feline patients presents a clinical challenge, particularly as glaucoma is often secondary to other disease processes in cats. In this review, we consider the clinical features, pathophysiology, and classification of the feline glaucomas and provide current evidence to direct selection of appropriate treatment strategies for feline glaucoma patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAqueous HumorCat DiseasesCatsGlaucomaIntraocular Pressure

Identifiers

PMID21923820
PMCPMC3348181
OpenAlexW1833679333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.