ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2012
Surgical management of ulcerative colitis.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causes of Colectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Findings from an Iranian National Registry.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- Is Hartmann's Pouch an Option in the Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Long-term cost and complications of surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis: a claims data analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Severe ulcerative colitis: predictors of response and algorithm proposal for rescue therapy.Irish journal of medical science · 2018Article
- Therapeutic inhibition of prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing enzymes in surgery: putative applications and challenges.Hypoxia (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Review
- Anti-TNF alpha in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a valid approach for organ-sparing or an expensive option to delay surgery?World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Review
- Long-term quality of life after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgery is the only curative option in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Despite advances in the medical management surgery is required in about a third of patients. SURGICAL MANAGEMENT: In the acute setting surgery is indicated when medical treatment fails to improve an episode of acute severe colitis. The intervention of choice is a staged colectomy with end ileostomy and preservation of the rectal stump in the first instance. Indications for elective surgery are failure of medical therapy and malignant transformation. The surgical options include conventional proctectomy with ileostomy or a Kock's continent ileostomy and colectomy with an ileorectal anastomosis. The current gold standard is restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Most frequently the technique includes a J pouch with a stapled anastomosis and temporary faecal diversion with a loop ileostomy. Laparoscopic pouch surgery is a feasible and safe option with an excellent cosmetic result.
conclusionsAlthough the morbidity remains significant after surgery, the quality of life is good with a satisfactory long-term functional outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.