Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21922248›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2012

Heterozygosis and pathogenicity of Cryptococcus neoformans AD-hybrid isolates.

M Cogliati, F Barchiesi, E Spreghini, Anna Maria Tortorano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary Cryptococcosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  2. Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evolutionary role of interspecies hybridization and genetic exchanges in yeasts.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M CogliatiDipartimento di Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. massimo.cogliati@unimi.it
F Barchiesi
E Spreghini
Anna Maria Tortorano
Marche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nineteen Cryptococcus neoformans AD-hybrid isolates were investigated to assess whether hybrid genomic background could affect virulence in a mouse model. The level of heterozygosity of each strain was analyzed using primers specific for allele A and D of 15 polymorphic genes. Virulence was tested in a mouse model of systemic infection by measuring time of survival. In addition, the putative virulence attributes, melanin, phospholipase, and capsule production, as well as growth at 39°C and UV sensitivity were investigated. Eight strains showed to be heterozygous in up to 70% of loci, other eight strains were heterozygous in less than 60% of loci, while the remaining three strains were homozygous at all tested loci. Mice infected with hybrids with a high percentage of heterozygosis showed significantly (P < 0.01) shorter survival than mice infected with the other hybrids. Mortality was not correlated with the mating-type locus pattern, as well as it was not correlated with the level of expression of the different virulence attributes investigated. The present study confirms that hybridization in C. neoformans could represent an important evolutionary driving force in increasing the fitness of this yeast in the environment and in the host.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansDisease Models, AnimalHeterozygoteMaleMiceSurvival AnalysisVirulenceVirulence FactorsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID21922248
OpenAlexW2326770896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.