Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2012
Prophylactic treatment of local reactions to i.v. vinorelbine: a randomized study.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of local site reactions to subcutaneous glatiramer acetate treatment of multiple sclerosis: a clinicopathological study.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocal reactions on the site of infusion are common with i.v. vinorelbine treatment. PURPOSE: The study aims were to evaluate whether an i.v. saline infusion or steroid injection, or the combination of these measures, could decrease vinorelbine-related local reactions and to study to what extent such reactions actually occur.
methodsPatients with lung cancer and planned chemotherapy containing i.v. vinorelbine were randomized in a 2 × 2 factorial design to receive either 4 mg betamethasone or placebo i.v. prior to and either 20 or 250 ml saline infusion following the vinorelbine infusion. Local infusion site signs and symptoms were recorded during and 1 h after the vinorelbine infusion and collected by a study-specific diary 24-48 h following each treatment course.
resultsA total of 79 patients were randomized and evaluable. Local infusion site signs, symptoms and reactions occurred in 63% of all patients (49% during vinorelbine monotherapy courses), with local pain being most frequently reported. Pre-treatment with i.v. betamethasone was associated with a reduced risk of local pain (5/38 vs. 20/39; p < 0.001) or any symptoms (14/38 vs. 29/39; p = 0.01) compared with placebo during the 48 h following the vinorelbine infusion. The reduced pain effect was seen both during vinorelbine monotherapy courses and during combination chemotherapy with carboplatin. In contrast, there was no difference between post-treatment infusion with 20 or 250 ml saline with regard to local signs or symptoms.
conclusionLocal infusion site side effects are common with i.v. vinorelbine. Pre-treatment with 4 mg betamethasone i.v. is associated with a reduced risk of local symptoms or reactions, local pain in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.