ReviewCurrent urology reports2011
Emerging and novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of male erectile dysfunction.
Review in Current urology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Options for Erectile Dysfunction.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Canadian consensus algorithm for erectile rehabilitation following prostate cancer treatment.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019Article
- Molecular and functional characterization of Kv 7 channels in penile arteries and corpus cavernosum of healthy and metabolic syndrome rats.British journal of pharmacology · 2016Article
- Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.Nature reviews. Urology · 2015Review
- Current status of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.Korean journal of urology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past few decades, a dramatic increase in our understanding of the pathophysiology of penile erection has occurred. The advent of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED), while the introduction of modern penile prosthesis has almost completely replaced the need for vascular surgery. Despite the efficacy of current therapeutic options for ED, they are not without limitations and remain insufficient to address the growing patient population and various underlying medical conditions. Newer and novel ED therapies aspire to treat underlying microvascular abnormalities, prevent cavernosal fibrosis, promote endothelial revascularization, modulate neurohormonal pathways, and regenerate new penile tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21922167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.