Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21921272›Full record

ReviewCirculation research2011

Drosophila, genetic screens, and cardiac function.

Matthew J Wolf, Howard A Rockman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The BKPhysiological reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Insights into human kidney function from the study of Drosophila.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Conservation of cardiac L-type CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Buoyancy-based Method of Determining Fat Levels in Drosophila.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew J WolfDepartment of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. wolf0008@mc.duke.edu
Howard A Rockman

Funding

Identifying Cardiomyopathy Genes in Mice and DrosophilaR01HL083065 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROCKMAN, HOWARD A · 2006 to 2014
$3.5M
Genetic modifiers of dilated cardiomyopathy in adult DrosophilaK08HL085072 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WOLF, MATTHEW J · 2007 to 2011
$631k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL085072NHLBI NIH HHS K08HL085072NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been used to study genetics, development, and signaling for nearly a century, but only over the past few decades has this tremendous resource been the focus of cardiovascular research. Fly genetics offers sophisticated transgenic systems, molecularly defined genomic deficiencies, genome-wide transgenic RNAi lines, and numerous curated mutants to perform genetic screens. As a genetically tractable model, the fly facilitates gene discovery and can complement mammalian models of disease. The circulatory system in the fly comprises well-defined sets of cardiomyocytes, and methodological advances have permitted accurate characterization of cardiac morphology and function. Thus, fly genetics and genomics offer new approaches for gene discovery of adult cardiac phenotypes to identify evolutionarily conserved molecular signals that drive cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringGenetic TestingAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCardiovascular DiseasesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMorphogenesisPhenotypeDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21921272
PMCPMC3678974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.