Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21921206›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2011

Preclinical prophylactic efficacy testing of Sm-p80-based vaccine in a nonhuman primate model of Schistosoma mansoni infection and immunoglobulin G and E responses to Sm-p80 in human serum samples from an area where schistosomiasis is endemic.

Gul Ahmad, Weidong Zhang, Workineh Torben, Afzal Ahrorov, Raymond T Damian, Roman F Wolf, Gary L White, David W Carey, Pauline N M Mwinzi, Lisa Ganley-Leal and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The efficacy of cercarial antigen loaded on nanoparticles as a potential vaccine candidate inJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Immunological Considerations forFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Gul AhmadDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Weidong Zhang
Workineh Torben
Afzal Ahrorov
Raymond T Damian
Roman F Wolf
Gary L White
David W Carey
Pauline N M Mwinzi
Lisa Ganley-Leal
Ronald C Kennedy
Afzal A Siddiqui
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USBoston University · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

CORE--BABOON RESEARCH RESOURCE PROGRAMP40RR012317 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI WHITE, GARY L · 1998 to 2011
$13.0M
DEVELOPMENT OF AN SPF BABOON COLONYR24RR016556 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI WHITE, GARY L · 2002 to 2011
$5.8M
Experimental Molecular Vaccines for SchistosomiasisR01AI071223 · NIAID · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI SIDDIQUI, AFZAL A · 2008 to 2012
$2.6M
The role of CD23+ B cells in human schistosomiasisR21AI074843 · NIAID · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI GANLEY-LEAL, LISA M · 2008 to 2009
$443k
NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR012317NCRR NIH HHS P40RR012317NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR016556NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071223NIAID NIH HHS R01AI071223NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI074843NIAID NIH HHS R27AI074843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prophylactic efficacy of a schistosome antigen (Sm-p80) was tested in a nonhuman primate model, the baboon. Using a total of 28 baboons, different vaccination strategies were used including recombinant Sm-p80 protein formulated in Toll-like receptor 7 and Toll-like receptor 9 agonists, and DNA priming followed by boosting with protein plus adjuvants. Recombinant protein approaches provided levels of prophylactic efficacy of 52%-58%, whereas prime-boost approaches conferred 38%-47% protection in baboons. An appropriately balanced pro-inflammatory (T-helper 17 [Th17] and Th1) and anti-inflammatory (Th2) type of response was generated; the Th1 and Th17 types of immune responses appear to be indicative of increased prophylactic efficacy. Production and expression of several cytokines (interleukin 2 [IL-2], interferon γ, IL-12α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-22) were up-regulated in vaccinated animals. Human correlate studies revealed Sm-p80 reactivity with immunoglobulin G in human serum samples from schistosome-infected individuals. In addition, a complete lack of prevailing Sm-p80-specific immunoglobulin E in a high-risk or infected population was observed, thus minimizing the risk of hypersensitivity reaction following vaccination with Sm-p80 in humans. This study provided the proof of concept to move Sm-p80 forward into further preclinical development leading to human clinical trials.

Indexed as

Endemic DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GMalePapioPrimate DiseasesSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniSerumAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthCytokinesImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GVaccines, DNAVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID21921206
PMCPMC3182311
OpenAlexW2142193917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.