Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21920901›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2011

Comparative analysis of teleost genome sequences reveals an ancient intron size expansion in the zebrafish lineage.

Stephen P Moss, Domino A Joyce, Stuart Humphries, Katherine J Tindall, David H Lunt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population genetic diversity in zebrafish lines.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Function-valued traits in evolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen P MossDepartment of Biological Sciences, The University of Hull, Kingston-Upon-Hull, United Kingdom.
Domino A Joyce
Stuart Humphries
Katherine J Tindall
David H Lunt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a bioinformatics pipeline for the comparative evolutionary analysis of Ensembl genomes and have used it to analyze the introns of the five available teleost fish genomes. We show our pipeline to be a powerful tool for revealing variation between genomes that may otherwise be overlooked with simple summary statistics. We identify that the zebrafish, Danio rerio, has an unusual distribution of intron sizes, with a greater number of larger introns in general and a notable peak in the frequency of introns of approximately 500 to 2,000 bp compared with the monotonically decreasing frequency distributions of the other fish. We determine that 47% of D. rerio introns are composed of repetitive sequences, although the remainder, over 331 Mb, is not. Because repetitive elements may be the origin of the majority of all noncoding DNA, it is likely that the remaining D. rerio intronic sequence has an ancient repetitive origin and has since accumulated so many mutations that it can no longer be recognized as such. To study such an ancient expansion of repeats in the Danio, lineage will require further comparative analysis of fish genomes incorporating a broader distribution of teleost lineages.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeIntronsAnimalsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID21920901
PMCPMC3205604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.