Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21920321›Full record

ReviewAdvances in protein chemistry and structural biology2011

Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities.

Emilio Gallicchio, Ronald M Levy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential distribution theory of alchemical transfer.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Drug Design by Pharmacophore and Virtual Screening Approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emilio GallicchioDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, BioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Ronald M Levy

Funding

DYNAMICS OF PEPTIDES AND PROTEINSR01GM030580 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI LEVY, RONALD · 1985 to 2018
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM30580NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review recent theoretical and algorithmic advances for the modeling of protein ligand binding free energies. We first describe a statistical mechanics theory of noncovalent association, with particular focus on deriving the fundamental formulas on which computational methods are based. The second part reviews the main computational models and algorithms in current use or development, pointing out the relations with each other and with the theory developed in the first part. Particular emphasis is given to the modeling of conformational reorganization and entropic effect. The methods reviewed are free energy perturbation, double decoupling, the Binding Energy Distribution Analysis Method, the potential of mean force method, mining minima and MM/PBSA. These models have different features and limitations, and their ranges of applicability vary correspondingly. Yet their origins can all be traced back to a single fundamental theory.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyAlgorithmsBinding SitesLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsThermodynamicsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21920321
PMCPMC3445424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.