Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21919989›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2012

DSM criteria for tobacco use disorder and tobacco withdrawal: a critique and proposed revisions for DSM-5.

Timothy B Baker, Naomi Breslau, Lirio Covey, Saul Shiffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Dependence Measures for Exclusive Electronic Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timothy B BakerDepartment of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA. tbb@ctri.medicine.wisc.edu
Naomi Breslau
Lirio Covey
Saul Shiffman

Funding

CU PARTNERS: NY/LONG ISLAND REGIONAL NODEU10DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI NUNES, EDWARD V., ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2001 to 2015
$47.6M
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Varenicline Based Smoking Cessation TreatmentR01HL109031 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKER, TIMOTHY B, STEIN, JAMES H · 2011 to 2020
$17.5M
The Collaborative Genetic Study of Nicotine DependenceP01CA089392 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIERUT, LAURA J. · 2001 to 2012
$17.3M
Tobacco Dependence: Treatment and OutcomesP50DA019706 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FIORE, MICHAEL C · 2004 to 2008
$8.6M
Understanding Emerging Patterns of Non-Daily Smoking: Field and Lab AssessmentsR01DA020742 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIFFMAN, SAUL · 2006 to 2010
$2.8M
Training in Translational Tobacco ScienceK05CA139871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BAKER, TIMOTHY B · 2008 to 2012
$850k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA139871NCI NIH HHS P01 CA089392NCI NIH HHS P01 CA89392NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109031NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA019706NIDA NIH HHS P50DA019706-10NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA02074NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020742NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013035NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA01332-S3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis paper aims to identify appropriate criteria for tobacco dependence assessment, evaluate relevant research and suggest revisions that may be incorporated into DSM-5.

methodsDesirable conceptual and psychometric features of tobacco dependence assessments were identified, including the types of outcomes against which such assessment should be validated. DSM-IV criteria were matched against these criteria and compared with other dependence measures.

resultsDSM-IV criteria were found to be ambiguous, little used in tobacco research, and have relatively low predictive validity. Other dependence measures were found to have greater validity in the prediction of important dependence features such as relapse likelihood. Strength of urges to smoke on typical smoking days and during abstinence, markers of nicotine intake or frequency of smoking and latency to smoke soon after waking were found to be useful dependence measures.

conclusionThe use and utility of DSM-5 will be enhanced by eliminating most DSM-IV criteria and adding new ones based on smoking pattern, smoking heaviness, and the severity of craving during periods of smoking and withdrawal.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTime FactorsTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID21919989
PMCPMC3246568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.