Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21919923›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2011

Subjective responses to alcohol: a paradigm shift may be brewing.

Andrea C King, Daniel J O Roche, Sandra Y Rueger

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Validation of the brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (B-BAES).Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2013
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Factor Structure of Subjective Responses to Alcohol in Light and Heavy Drinkers.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea C King
Daniel J O Roche
Sandra Y Rueger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe meta-analysis by Quinn and Fromme (2011) is reviewed and integrated into the larger field. Guidelines for future research are presented.

resultsWith results of the meta-analysis along with those of a recent comprehensive prospective study by our group (King et al., 2011), there is a call to the field to specify terms and integrate theoretical frameworks to advance our knowledge and improve comparisons across trials.

conclusionsThe meta-analysis is both timely and thorough and will provide clinical researchers with important information to move the field forward.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationAlcoholismFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.