The primary care physician and Alzheimer’s disease: an international position paper.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Barriers in screening for dementia in elderly migrants in primary care and the use of the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale. A mixed cross-sectional and qualitative study.The European journal of general practice · 2021
   Article
2. The Impact of Dementia's Affiliate Stigma on the Mental Health of Relatives: A Cross Section Survey.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
   Article
3. Behavioral management in the person with dementia.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2013
   Article
4. Recruitment, retention and other methodological issues related to clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as