Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21918178›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2012

Inferring species networks from gene trees in high-polyploid North American and Hawaiian violets (Viola, Violaceae).

Thomas Marcussen, Kjetill S Jakobsen, Jirí Danihelka, Harvey E Ballard, Kim Blaxland, Anne K Brysting, Bengt Oxelman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The hybrid number of a ploidy profile.Journal of mathematical biology · 2022
    Article
  7. A Revised Phylogenetic Classification forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PhytoKeys · 2022
    Article
  11. The complete plastid genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Unraveling Reticulate Evolution inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Has the Polyploid Wave Ebbed?Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas Marcussen1Department of Biology, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.
Kjetill S Jakobsen
Jirí Danihelka
Harvey E Ballard
Kim Blaxland
Anne K Brysting
Bengt Oxelman
University of Oslo · NOCzech Academy of Sciences · CZOhio University · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phylogenies of allopolyploids take the shape of networks and cannot be adequately represented as bifurcating trees. Especially for high polyploids (i.e., organisms with more than six sets of nuclear chromosomes), the signatures of gene homoeolog loss, deep coalescence, and polyploidy may become confounded, with the result that gene trees may be congruent with more than one species network. Herein, we obtained the most parsimonious species network by objective comparison of competing scenarios involving polyploidization and homoeolog loss in a high-polyploid lineage of violets (Viola, Violaceae) mostly or entirely restricted to North America, Central America, or Hawaii. We amplified homoeologs of the low-copy nuclear gene, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI), by single-molecule polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the chloroplast trnL-F region by conventional PCR for 51 species and subspecies. Topological incongruence among GPI homoeolog subclades, owing to deep coalescence and two instances of putative loss (or lack of detection) of homoeologs, were reconciled by applying the maximum tree topology for each subclade. The most parsimonious species network and the fossil-based calibration of the homoeolog tree favored monophyly of the high polyploids, which has resulted from allodecaploidization 9-14 Ma, involving sympatric ancestors from the extant Viola sections Chamaemelanium (diploid), Plagiostigma (paleotetraploid), and Viola (paleotetraploid). Although two of the high-polyploid lineages (Boreali-Americanae, Pedatae) remained decaploid, recurrent polyploidization with tetraploids of section Plagiostigma within the last 5 Ma has resulted in two 14-ploid lineages (Mexicanae, Nosphinium) and one 18-ploid lineage (Langsdorffianae). This implies a more complex phylogenetic and biogeographic origin of the Hawaiian violets (Nosphinium) than that previously inferred from rDNA data and illustrates the necessity of considering polyploidy in phylogenetic and biogeographic reconstruction.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyCell NucleusDNA, ChloroplastDNA, PlantGlucose-6-Phosphate IsomeraseHawaiiNorth AmericaPolymerase Chain ReactionPolyploidyRNA, PlantSequence Analysis, DNAViolaDNA, ChloroplastDNA, PlantGlucose-6-Phosphate IsomeraseRNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID21918178
PMCPMC3243738
OpenAlexW2067254837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.