ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011
Evaluation of four commercial real-time PCR assays for detection of Bordetella spp. in nasopharyngeal aspirates.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral spinal fluid positive pertussis encephalopathy in infants: Case reports.SAGE open medical case reports · 2021Article
- Identification of etiologic agents and clinical characteristics for patients suspected of having pertussis in a large Children's Hospital in China.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis of the Respiratory Disease Pertussis on a Point-of-Care Biochip.EClinicalMedicine · 2019Article
- Follow-Up of External Quality Controls for PCR-Based Diagnosis of Whooping Cough in a Hospital Laboratory Network (Renacoq) and in Other Hospital and Private Laboratories in France.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016Article
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Pertussis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015Review
- Incidence and factors predicting whooping cough due to parapertussis diagnosis among patients referred to general practitioners, Poland, 2009-2011.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015Article
- How to fight pertussis?Therapeutic advances in vaccines · 2013Article
- Towards improved accuracy of Bordetella pertussis nucleic acid amplification tests.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Review
- Detection of Bordetella pertussis in Infants Suspected to have Whooping Cough.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the performances of 4 commercial real-time PCR kits for Bordetella pertussis IS481 sequence detection in nasopharyngeal aspirates by comparison with an in-house real-time PCR assay. Among them, the Simplexa Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis assay (Focus Diagnostics), the SmartCycler Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis assay (Cepheid), and Bordetella R-gene (Argene) present sensitivities over 90%. One kit proved unsuitable for routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.