Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21918002›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Differential neural representation of oral ethanol by central taste-sensitive neurons in ethanol-preferring and genetically heterogeneous rats.

Christian H Lemon, David M Wilson, Susan M Brasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influences of ethanol and temperature on sucrose-evoked response of gustatory neurons in the hamster solitary nucleus.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christian H LemonDepartment of Pharmacological and Physiological Science, St. Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 South Grand Blvd., St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. clemon@slu.edu
David M Wilson
Susan M Brasser
Saint Louis University · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceR24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2005 to 2014
$5.1M
Orosensory Contributions to Alcohol IngestionR01AA015741 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BRASSER, SUSAN M · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA-015512NIAAA NIH HHS AA-015741NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In randomly bred rats, orally applied ethanol stimulates neural substrates for appetitive sweet taste. To study associations between ethanol's oral sensory characteristics and genetically mediated ethanol preference, we made electrophysiological recordings of oral responses (spike density) by taste-sensitive nucleus tractus solitarii neurons in anesthetized selectively bred ethanol-preferring (P) rats and their genetically heterogeneous Wistar (W) control strain. Stimuli (25 total) included ethanol [3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 25%, and 40% (vol/vol)], a sucrose series (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1 M), and other sweet, salt, acidic, and bitter stimuli; 50 P and 39 W neurons were sampled. k-means clustering applied to the sucrose response series identified cells showing high (S(1)) or relatively low (S(0)) sensitivity to sucrose. A three-way factorial analysis revealed that activity to ethanol was influenced by a neuron's sensitivity to sucrose, ethanol concentration, and rat line (P = 0.01). Ethanol produced concentration-dependent responses in S(1) neurons that were larger than those in S(0) cells. Although responses to ethanol by S(1) cells did not differ between lines, neuronal firing rates to ethanol in S(0) cells increased across concentration only in P rats. Correlation and multivariate analyses revealed that ethanol evoked responses in W neurons that were strongly and selectively associated with activity to sweet stimuli, whereas responses to ethanol by P neurons were not easily associated with activity to representative sweet, sodium salt, acidic, or bitter stimuli. These findings show differential central neural representation of oral ethanol between genetically heterogeneous rats and P rats genetically selected to prefer alcohol.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdministration, OralAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCentral Nervous System DepressantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFood PreferencesMaleModels, BiologicalRatsRats, WistarSensory Receptor CellsSolitary NucleusStatistics as TopicStimulation, ChemicalCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID21918002
PMCPMC3234093
OpenAlexW2136982355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.