Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2012
Evaluation of abatacept administered subcutaneously in adults with active rheumatoid arthritis: impact of withdrawal and reintroduction on immunogenicity, efficacy and safety (phase Iiib ALLOW study).
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IIIb, Multi-Center, Randomized, Withdrawal Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of Subcutaneous Administered Abatacept in Adults With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase IV, Open Label Study Introducing a Single IV Treatment With Abatacept in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Currently Receiving Weekly Injections of SC Abatacept to Simulate a Holiday or Patient Vacation
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dosing down with biologic therapies: a systematic review and clinicians' perspective.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis naive to methotrexate: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for people with rheumatoid arthritis unsuccessfully treated with biologics: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Biologics or tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis in incomplete responders to methotrexate or other traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- [Recommendations for use of abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2014Guideline
- Re-establishment of efficacy of tofacitinib, an oral JAK inhibitor, after temporary discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2020Trial
- Change from subcutaneous to intravenous abatacept and back in patients with rheumatoid arthritis as simulation of a vacation: a prospective phase IV, open-label trial (A-BREAK).Arthritis research & therapy · 2016Trial
- Sustainable Efficacy of Switching From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2015Trial
- Phase III study of the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous tocilizumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2014Trial
- Preferable effect of CTLA4-Ig on both bone erosion and bone microarchitecture in rheumatoid arthritis revealed by HR-pQCT.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Assessing Immunogenicity of Biologic Drugs in Inflammatory Joint Diseases: Progress Towards Personalized Medicine.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Review
- A Novel Therapeutic Effect of a New Variant of CTLA4-Ig with Four Antennas That Are Terminally Capped with Sialic Acid in the CTLA4 Region.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Immunogenicity from Abatacept-Treated Pediatric Patients With Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Findings From Two Phase III Clinical Trials.ACR open rheumatology · 2022Article
- Anti-TROVE2 Antibody Determined by Immune-Related Array May Serve as a Predictive Marker for Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Effectiveness in RA.Journal of immunology research · 2021Article
- Subcutaneous abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis: A real-life experience.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2019Review
- Abatacept: A Review in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Drugs · 2017Review
- bDMARD Dose Reduction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review with Systematic Literature Search.Rheumatology and therapy · 2017Review
- Article
- Unintended Immunological Consequences of Biologic Therapy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effect of a temporary interruption in subcutaneous (SC) abatacept on immunogenicity, safety and efficacy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate in a phase III trial.
methodsFollowing a 12-week open-label introduction (period I; intravenous abatacept loading dose and weekly fixed-dose SC abatacept 125 mg), patients were randomised 2:1 to double-blind SC placebo or SC abatacept for 12 weeks (period II). At the end of period II, patients receiving SC abatacept continued treatment and patients on placebo were reintroduced to SC abatacept (12-week open-label period III). The co-primary end points were ELISA-detected immunogenicity rate and safety at the end of period II. Efficacy was also monitored.
resultsOf 167 patients entering period I, 72% qualified for period II; during periods II and III, three patients discontinued treatment. Mean (SD) disease duration was 6.6 (6.5) years and Disease Activity Score 28 was 4.8 (0.8). The primary end point was met, with a non-significant increase in immunogenicity upon withdrawal (7/73 placebo vs 0/38 abatacept in period II; p=0.119) which was reversed upon reintroduction of SC abatacept (2/73 vs 1/38, end period III). Safety was comparable regardless of withdrawal, with no unexpected events upon reintroduction. Two patients experienced reactions at the SC injection site. On withdrawal, patients experienced slight worsening in efficacy which improved following reintroduction.
conclusionsOverall immunogenicity to SC abatacept is low, consistent with intravenous abatacept, and is not significantly affected by a 3-month interruption and reintroduction. This stop-start schedule was well tolerated, with little impact on safety and efficacy. These are important considerations for the clinical use of SC abatacept. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier NCT00533897.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.