Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21917602›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2011

The use of mouse models to investigate shear bond strength in amelogenesis imperfecta.

M K Pugach, F Ozer, Y Li, K Sheth, R Beasley, A Resnick, L Daneshmehr, A B Kulkarni, J D Bartlett, C W Gibson and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Integrative multi-omics and bioinformatic analysis ofThe Japanese dental science review · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M K PugachDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
F Ozer
Y Li
K Sheth
R Beasley
A Resnick
L Daneshmehr
A B Kulkarni
J D Bartlett
C W Gibson
R G Lindemeyer
University of Pennsylvania · USNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · US

Funding

Enamelysin Processing Mechanisms in AmelogenesisR01DE016276 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2006 to 2014
$4.4M
ENAMEL MINERAL FORMATION DURING MURINE ODONTOGENESISR01DE011089 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GIBSON, CAROLYN · 1995 to 2012
$3.9M
Molecular Roles of TGF-beta Signaling in Salivary Glands and Oral CancerZIADE000723 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI KULKARNI, ASHOK · 2009 to 2012
$2.4M
Enamelysin Processing Mechanisms in AmelogenesisR56DE016276 · NIDCR · ADA FORSYTH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI BARTLETT, JOHN D · 2011 to 2011
$498k
The Role of the C-terminus of Amelogenen in Enamel StructureF32DE019968 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PUGACH, MEGAN KARDON · 2009 to 2011
$148k
NIDCR NIH HHS DE011089NIDCR NIH HHS DE016276NIDCR NIH HHS DE019968NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE019968NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE011089NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016276NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE016276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) have defective enamel; therefore, bonded restorations of patients with AI have variable success rates. To distinguish which cases of AI may have good clinical outcomes with bonded materials, we evaluated etching characteristics and bond strength of enamel in mouse models, comparing wild-type (WT) with those having mutations in amelogenin (Amelx) and matrix metalloproteinase-20 (Mmp20), which mimic 2 forms of human AI. Etched enamel surfaces were compared for roughness by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Bonding was compared through shear bond strength (SBS) studies with 2 different systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch). Etched enamel surfaces of incisors from Amelx knock-out (AmelxKO) mice appeared randomly organized and non-uniform compared with WT. Etching of Mmp20KO surfaces left little enamel, and the etching pattern was indistinguishable from unetched surfaces. SBS results were significantly different when AmelxKO and Mmp20KO enamel surfaces were compared. A significant increase in SBS was measured for all samples when the self-etch system was compared with the etch-and-rinse system. We have developed a novel system for testing shear bond strength of mouse incisors with AI variants, and analysis of these data may have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with AI.

Indexed as

Dental BondingDisease Models, AnimalAcid Etching, DentalAmelogenesis ImperfectaAmelogeninAnimalsDental EnamelDental Stress AnalysisMatrix Metalloproteinase 20MiceMice, KnockoutShear StrengthSurface PropertiesAmelogeninMatrix Metalloproteinase 20

Identifiers

PMID21917602
PMCPMC3188463
OpenAlexW2006966469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.