ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2011
Molecular evolution under increasing transposable element burden in Drosophila: a speed limit on the evolutionary arms race.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory Logic and Transposable Element Dynamics in Caenorhabditis Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Positive Selection Targeted Primate Genes that Encode Transposable Element Repressors.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Relaxed Purifying Selection is Associated with an Accumulation of Transposable Elements in Flies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Article
- Rapid Evolution of Autosomal Binding Sites of the Dosage Compensation Complex inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Adaptive evolution among cytoplasmic piRNA proteins leads to decreased genomic auto-immunity.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Host-transposon interactions: conflict, cooperation, and cooption.Genes & development · 2019Review
- RNA-Interference Pathways Display High Rates of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Multiple Invertebrates.Genetics · 2018Article
- Silencing of Transposable Elements by piRNAs in Drosophila: An Evolutionary Perspective.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2017Review
- Natural variation of piRNA expression affects immunity to transposable elements.PLoS genetics · 2017Article
- TEtools facilitates big data expression analysis of transposable elements and reveals an antagonism between their activity and that of piRNA genes.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- What Drives Positive Selection in theThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2016Review
- Article
- Unique transposon landscapes are pervasive across Drosophila melanogaster genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Conserved piRNA Expression from a Distinct Set of piRNA Cluster Loci in Eutherian Mammals.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Rapid evolution of piRNA pathway in the teleost fish: implication for an adaptation to transposon diversity.Genome biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Recurrent and recent selective sweeps in the piRNA pathway.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2013Article
- Article
- Article
- Evolution of animal Piwi-interacting RNAs and prokaryotic CRISPRs.Briefings in functional genomics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenome architecture is profoundly influenced by transposable elements (TEs), and natural selection against their harmful effects is a critical factor limiting their spread. Genome defense by the piRNA silencing pathway also plays a crucial role in limiting TE proliferation. How these two forces jointly determine TE abundance is not well understood. To shed light on the nature of factors that predict TE success, we test three distinct hypotheses in the Drosophila genus. First, we determine whether TE abundance and relaxed genome-wide purifying selection on protein sequences are positively correlated. This serves to test the hypothesis that variation in TE abundance in the Drosophila genus can be explained by the strength of natural selection, relative to drift, acting in parallel against mildly deleterious non-synonymous mutations. Second, we test whether increasing TE abundance is correlated with an increased rate of amino-acid evolution in genes encoding the piRNA machinery, as might be predicted by an evolutionary arms race model. Third, we test whether increasing TE abundance is correlated with greater codon bias in genes of the piRNA machinery. This is predicted if increasing TE abundance selects for increased efficiency in the machinery of genome defense.
resultsSurprisingly, we find neither of the first two hypotheses to be true. Specifically, we found that genome-wide levels of purifying selection, measured by the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rates (ω), were greater in species with greater TE abundance. In addition, species with greater TE abundance have greater levels of purifying selection in the piRNA machinery. In contrast, it appears that increasing TE abundance has primarily driven adaptation in the piRNA machinery by increasing codon bias.
conclusionsThese results indicate that within the Drosophila genus, a historically reduced strength of selection relative to drift is unlikely to explain patterns of increased TE success across species. Other factors, such as ecological exposure, are likely to contribute to variation in TE abundances within species. Furthermore, constraints on the piRNA machinery may temper the evolutionary arms race that would drive increasing rates of evolution at the amino acid level. In the face of these constraints, selection may act primarily by improving the translational efficiency of the machinery of genome defense through efficient codon usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.