Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21915777›Full record

ReviewTopics in current chemistry2012

Application of NMR and molecular docking in structure-based drug discovery.

Jaime L Stark, Robert Powers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Topics in current chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Fluorescence-Based Protein Stability Monitoring-A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Applications of Solution NMR in Drug Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaime L StarkDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.
Robert Powers

Funding

EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH FACILITIES CONSTRUCTIONC06RR015468 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI PAUL, PREM S · 2000 to 2000
$2.0M
Revealing Functions for Newly Discovered Proteins by FAST-NMRR21AI081154 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI POWERS, ROBERT · 2009 to 2010
$376k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015468NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI081154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery is a complex and costly endeavor, where few drugs that reach the clinical testing phase make it to market. High-throughput screening (HTS) is the primary method used by the pharmaceutical industry to identify initial lead compounds. Unfortunately, HTS has a high failure rate and is not particularly efficient at identifying viable drug leads. These shortcomings have encouraged the development of alternative methods to drive the drug discovery process. Specifically, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and molecular docking are routinely being employed as important components of drug discovery research. Molecular docking provides an extremely rapid way to evaluate likely binders from a large chemical library with minimal cost. NMR ligand-affinity screens can directly detect a protein-ligand interaction, can measure a corresponding dissociation constant, and can reliably identify the ligand binding site and generate a co-structure. Furthermore, NMR ligand affinity screens and molecular docking are perfectly complementary techniques, where the combination of the two has the potential to improve the efficiency and success rate of drug discovery. This review will highlight the use of NMR ligand affinity screens and molecular docking in drug discovery and describe recent examples where the two techniques were combined to identify new and effective therapeutic drugs.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryBinding SitesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysLigandsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtein ConformationProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID21915777
PMCPMC6628936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.