Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21915733›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2011

Pharmacokinetic differences between the epimers of cefotetan disodium after single intravenous injection in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Meng-xiang Su, Min-hong Liu, Bin Di, Li-li Huang, Yuan Jiang, Peng-cheng Ma, Tai-jun Hang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meng-xiang SuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Min-hong Liu
Bin Di
Li-li Huang
Yuan Jiang
Peng-cheng Ma
Tai-jun Hang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic behaviors of the epimers of cefotetan disodium (R-CTT, S-CTT) after a single intravenous injection dose in healthy Chinese volunteers were explored in this study. In an open-label, randomized, three-way, cross-over study, 12 volunteers (6 females and 6 males) received a cross-over fashion doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g of cefotetan disodium, separated by washout periods of 7 days. The plasma concentrations of both epimers were measured by validated high-performance liquid chromatography assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters of R-CTT, S-CTT, and total-CTT (R + S mixture) were calculated using a noncompartmental analysis. Generally, the R and S epimers showed different pharmacokinetic behaviors. Following 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g doses of cefotetan disodium, values of the total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) were 124.23 ± 19.54, 231.34 ± 39.34, and 459.09 ± 80.65 for R-CTT; 100.95 ± 14.19, 193.80 ± 30.42, and 372.66 ± 67.32 for S-CTT, respectively. Total body clearance values were 4.13, 4.43, and 4.46 L/h for R-CTT and 5.05, 5.28, and 5.50 L/h for S-CTT, respectively. Mean plasma elimination half-life (t (1/2)) values of R-CTT were 4.16, 4.13, and 4.01 h for 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 g doses, respectively, and those of S-CTT were 3.15, 3.25, and 3.21 h. There were significant differences in t (1/2) between the two epimers (P < 0.05). The t (1/2) of R-CTT was 28% longer than that of S-CTT, which indicated that the elimination of the S-CTT was greater than that of the R-CTT. All treatments were well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotetanCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleStereoisomerismAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotetan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.