ReviewDer Pathologe2011
[Precursor lesions: epidemiology--is there enough evidence?].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exact knowledge of the incidence and prevalence of precursor lesions of malignant diseases would be of great value for the precise evaluation of their potential clinical-pathological progression and therefore for planning and intervention in individual cases and also for planning and evaluation of prevention and early detection strategies. Concerning these high expectations it is surprising that precise data on incidence, prevalence and the exact risk for progression are lacking. Sources of data (cancer registries, specific registries for precursor lesions, early detection programs and specific designed studies) are analyzed concerning their validity and reliability. Imprecise and redundant terminology represents a crucial reason for the lack of data availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21915660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.