Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21915283›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Relationships between membrane binding, affinity and cell internalization efficacy of a cell-penetrating peptide: penetratin as a case study.

Isabel D Alves, Cherine Bechara, Astrid Walrant, Yefim Zaltsman, Chen-Yu Jiao, Sandrine Sagan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Peptide-Based Therapeutics in Cancer Therapy.Molecular biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Designed Multifunctional Peptides for Intracellular Targets.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel D AlvesUPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7203, LBM, Paris, France. i.alves@cbmn.u-bordeaux.fr
Cherine Bechara
Astrid Walrant
Yefim Zaltsman
Chen-Yu Jiao
Sandrine Sagan
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPenetratin is a positively charged cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that has the ability to bind negatively charged membrane components, such as glycosaminoglycans and anionic lipids. Whether this primary interaction of penetratin with these cell surface components implies that the peptide will be further internalized is not clear. METHODOLOGY: Using mass spectrometry, the amount of internalized and membrane bound penetratin remaining after washings, were quantified in three different cell lines: wild type (WT), glycosaminoglycans- (GAG(neg)) and sialic acid-deficient (SA(neg)) cells. Additionally, the affinity and kinetics of the interaction of penetratin to membrane models composed of pure lipids and membrane fragments from the referred cell lines was investigated, as well as the thermodynamics of such interactions using plasmon resonance and calorimetry. PRINCIPAL

findingsPenetratin internalized with the same efficacy in the three cell lines at 1 µM, but was better internalized at 10 µM in SA(neg)>WT>GAG(neg). The heat released by the interaction of penetratin with these cells followed the ranking order of internalization efficiency. Penetratin had an affinity of 10 nM for WT cells and µM for SA(neg) and GAG(neg) cells and model membrane of phospholipids. The remaining membrane-bound penetratin after cells washings was similar in WT and GAG(neg) cells, which suggested that these binding sites relied on membrane phospholipids. The interaction of penetratin with carbohydrates was more superficial and reversible while it was stronger with phospholipids, likely because the peptide can intercalate between the fatty acid chains. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that accumulation and high-affinity binding of penetratin at the cell-surface do not reflect the internalization efficacy of the peptide. Altogether, these data further support translocation (membrane phospholipids interaction) as being the internalization pathway used by penetratin at low micromolecular concentration, while endocytosis is activated at higher concentration and requires accumulation of the peptide on GAG and GAG clustering.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalorimetryCell MembraneCell-Penetrating PeptidesCHO CellsCricetinaeProtein BindingProtein TransportCell-Penetrating Peptides

Identifiers

PMID21915283
PMCPMC3167814
OpenAlexW1968639268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.