ArticleGenome research2011
Evolutionary divergence of intrinsic and trans-regulated nucleosome positioning sequences reveals plastic rules for chromatin organization.
Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequence and chemical specificity define the functional landscape of intrinsically disordered regions.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- CG-Based Stratification of 8-mers Highlights Functional Roles and Phylogenetic Divergence Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Leishmania major chromosomes are replicated from a single high-efficiency locus supplemented by thousands of lower efficiency initiation events.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Bimodal specificity of TF-DNA recognition in embryonic stem cells.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Species-aware DNA language models capture regulatory elements and their evolution.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Active Mechanism of Nucleosome Depletion by Poly(dA:dT) Tracts In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Ruler elements in chromatin remodelers set nucleosome array spacing and phasing.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Genome information processing by the INO80 chromatin remodeler positions nucleosomes.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Approaching Protein Barriers: Emerging Mechanisms of Replication Pausing in Eukaryotes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Beads on a string-nucleosome array arrangements and folding of the chromatin fiber.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2020Review
- Review
- Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast.Molecular cell · 2018Article
- Article
- Shelterin components mediate genome reorganization in response to replication stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Nucleosomal signatures impose nucleosome positioning in coding and noncoding sequences in the genome.Genome research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The packaging of eukaryotic genomes into nuclesomes plays critical roles in chromatin organization and gene regulation. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicate that nucleosome occupancy is partially encoded by intrinsic antinucleosomal DNA sequences, such as poly(A) sequences, as well as by binding sites for trans-acting factors that can evict nucleosomes, such as Reb1 and the Rsc3/30 complex. Here, we use genome-wide nucleosome occupancy maps in 13 Ascomycota fungi to discover large-scale evolutionary reprogramming of both intrinsic and trans determinants of chromatin structure. We find that poly(G)s act as intrinsic antinucleosomal sequences, comparable to the known function of poly(A)s, but that the abundance of poly(G)s has diverged greatly between species, obscuring their antinucleosomal effect in low-poly(G) species such as S. cerevisiae. We also develop a computational method that uses nucleosome occupancy maps for discovering trans-acting general regulatory factor (GRF) binding sites. Our approach reveals that the specific sequences bound by GRFs have diverged substantially across evolution, corresponding to a number of major evolutionary transitions in the repertoire of GRFs. We experimentally validate a proposed evolutionary transition from Cbf1 as a major GRF in pre-whole-genome duplication (WGD) yeasts to Reb1 in post-WGD yeasts. We further show that the mating type switch-activating protein Sap1 is a GRF in S. pombe, demonstrating the general applicability of our approach. Our results reveal that the underlying mechanisms that determine in vivo chromatin organization have diverged and that comparative genomics can help discover new determinants of chromatin organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.