Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21914513›Full record

SynthesisValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review.

Diana Papaioannou, John Brazier, Glenys Parry

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
39.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review of the psychometric properties of quality-of-life outcome measures used with adult inpatient psychiatric populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A systematic review of utility values in children with cerebral palsy.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Assessment of the construct validity and responsiveness of preference-based quality of life measures in people with Parkinson's: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. EQ-5D in skin conditions: an assessment of validity and responsiveness.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. A longitudinal assessment of the responsiveness of the ICECAP-A in a randomised controlled trial of a knee pain intervention.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. An exploratory study to test the impact on three "bolt-on" items to the EQ-5D.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2015
    Trial
  16. Quality of life for parents of children with influenza-like illness: development and validation of Care-ILI-QoL.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Development of the Japanese version of the Manchester short assessment of quality of life (MANSA) among people with self-reported severe mental illness.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diana PapaioannouSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. d.papaioannou@sheffield.ac.uk
John Brazier
Glenys Parry
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health 06/92/51Medical Research Council G0801394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGeneric health status measures such as the short form health survey (SF-36) and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) are increasingly being used to inform health policy. They are claimed to be applicable across disease areas and have started to be used within mental health research. This review aims to assess the construct validity and responsiveness of four generic health status measures in schizophrenia, including the preference-based SF-6D and EQ-5D.

methodA systematic review of the literature was undertaken. Ten databases were searched from inception to August 2009 and reference lists scrutinized to identify relevant studies. Studies were appraised and data extracted. A narrative synthesis was performed of the evidence on construct validity including known groups validity (detecting a difference in health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores between two different groups such as samples from the general population and people with schizophrenia), convergent validity (strength of association between generic HRQL and other measures (e.g., symptom or functional), and responsiveness. Responsiveness was considered by: 1) differences in generic HRQL measure scores in responders/non-responders and 2) correlation between changes on generic HRQL measures and changes in specific measures obtained from patients and clinicians.

resultsThirty-three studies were identified that provided data on the validity and/or responsiveness of the instruments. Most of the evidence concerns the SF-36 and EQ-5D, and for these instruments there was evidence for known group validity. The evidence for convergent validity and responsiveness was mixed, with studies presenting contradictory results.

conclusionAlthough the evidence base is limited in a number of important respects, including problems with the measures used to develop constructs in the validation studies, it is sufficient to raise doubts about the use of generic measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-36 in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID21914513
PMCPMC3179985
OpenAlexW2003595257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.