ArticleBMC public health2011
Health care for immigrants in Europe: is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study.
Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment adherence in migrants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2018Pooled it
- "How do ethnic minority patients experience the intercultural care encounter in hospitals? a systematic review of qualitative research".BMC medical ethics · 2017Pooled it
- Access to health insurance coverage among sub-Saharan African migrants living in France: Results of the ANRS-PARCOURS study.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Towards the development of actionable recommendations for improving mental healthcare access for migrants: a qualitative study in Munich, Germany.BMC public health · 2026Article
- 'Respond'-A novel approach to healthcare delivery for people seeking asylum.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Communication between Norwegian Pakistani patients and healthcare providers about traditional and complementary medicine: a qualitative study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
- Preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making among patients with a migration background in Belgium: a focus group study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- The Neurosurgical Immigrant Experience in Italy: Analysis of a Northeast Tertiary Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Developing an eco-bio-social conceptual framework for dengue virus transmission in Latin America and the Caribbean: An e-Delphi study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Uncovering multi-level mental healthcare barriers for migrants: a qualitative analysis across China, Germany, Netherlands, Romania, and South Africa.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Barriers to use of interpreters in outpatient mental health care: Exploring the attitudes of psychotherapists.Transcultural psychiatry · 2024Article
- Good practice in reaching and treating refugees in addiction care in Germany - a Delphi study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Integrated care competencies and their association with cross-cultural competence among registered nurses: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Strategies for improving access to primary care services for homeless immigrants in England: a Delphi study.Primary health care research & development · 2023Article
- [Structural discrimination and racism in hospital care: the role of the economic conditions in intercultural openness].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2022Article
- Beyond challenges and enrichment: a qualitative account of cross-cultural experiences of nursing patients with an ethnic minority background in Norway.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Victimization of Applicants for International Protection Residing in Belgium: Sexual Violence and Help-Seeking Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Barriers to Accessing Primary Care and Appropriateness of Healthcare Among Immigrants in Italy.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Health Service Utilization of International Immigrants in Yiwu, China: Implication for Health Policy.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2021Article
- Exploring how Syrian women manage their health after migration to Germany: results of a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEuropean Member States are facing a challenge to provide accessible and effective health care services for immigrants. It remains unclear how best to achieve this and what characterises good practice in increasingly multicultural societies across Europe. This study assessed the views and values of professionals working in different health care contexts and in different European countries as to what constitutes good practice in health care for immigrants.
methodsA total of 134 experts in 16 EU Member States participated in a three-round Delphi process. The experts represented four different fields: academia, Non-Governmental Organisations, policy-making and health care practice. For each country, the process aimed to produce a national consensus list of the most important factors characterising good practice in health care for migrants.
resultsThe scoring procedures resulted in 10 to 16 factors being identified as the most important for each participating country. All 186 factors were aggregated into 9 themes: (1) easy and equal access to health care, (2) empowerment of migrants, (3) culturally sensitive health care services, (4) quality of care, (5) patient/health care provider communication, (6) respect towards migrants, (7) networking in and outside health services, (8) targeted outreach activities, and (9) availability of data about specificities in migrant health care and prevention. Although local political debate, level of immigration and the nature of local health care systems influenced the selection and rating of factors within each country, there was a broad European consensus on most factors. Yet, discordance remained both within countries, e.g. on the need for prioritising cultural differences, and between countries, e.g. on the need for more consistent governance of health care services for immigrants.
conclusionsExperts across Europe asserted the right to culturally sensitive health care for all immigrants. There is a broad consensus among experts about the major principles of good practice that need to be implemented across Europe. However, there also is some disagreement both within and between countries on specific issues that require further research and debate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.