Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21913820›Full record

ArticleInhalation toxicology2011

The toxicological evaluation of realistic emissions of source aerosols study: statistical methods.

Brent A Coull, Gregory A Wellenius, Beatriz Gonzalez-Flecha, Edgar Diaz, Petros Koutrakis, John J Godleski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inhalation toxicology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brent A CoullDepartment of Biostatistics & Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. bcoull@hsph.harvard.edu
Gregory A Wellenius
Beatriz Gonzalez-Flecha
Edgar Diaz
Petros Koutrakis
John J Godleski

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES000002 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUSAN A KORRICK · 1985 to 2026
$44.6M
Analysis of High-Dimensional Environmental Health DataR01ES012044 · NIEHS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI COULL, BRENT ANDREW · 2004 to 2009
$1.2M
Mechanisms of Air Pollution Health Effects in Subjects with Heart FailureR00ES015774 · NIEHS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WELLENIUS, GREGORY A · 2009 to 2011
$747k
NIEHS NIH HHS ES00002NIEHS NIH HHS ES012044NIEHS NIH HHS ES015774NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000002NIEHS NIH HHS R00 ES015774NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES012044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Toxicological Evaluation of Realistic Emissions of Source Aerosols (TERESA) study involved withdrawal, aging, and atmospheric transformation of emissions of three coal-fired power plants. Toxicological evaluations were carried out in rats exposed to different emission scenarios with extensive exposure characterization. Data generated had multiple levels of resolution: exposure, scenario, and constituent chemical composition. Here, we outline a multilayered approach to analyze the associations between exposure and health effects beginning with standard ANOVA models that treat exposure as a categorical variable. The model assessed differences in exposure effects across scenarios (by plant). To assess unadjusted associations between pollutant concentrations and health, univariate analyses were conducted using the difference between the response means under exposed and control conditions and a single constituent concentration as the predictor. Then, a novel multivariate analysis of exposure composition and health was used based on Random Forests(™), a recent extension of classification and regression trees that were applied to the outcome differences. For each exposure constituent, this approach yielded a nonparametric measure of the importance of that constituent in predicting differences in response on a given day, controlling for the other measured constituent concentrations in the model. Finally, an R(2) analysis compared the relative importance of exposure scenario, plant, and constituent concentrations on each outcome. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) is used to demonstrate how the multiple levels of the analysis complement each other to assess constituents most strongly associated with health effects.

Indexed as

Statistics as TopicAir PollutantsAnimalsCoalEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringInhalation ExposureModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalParticulate MatterPower PlantsRatsToxicity TestsAir PollutantsCoalParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID21913820
PMCPMC3641936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.