Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21912808›Full record

Trial reportMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2011

Circulating damage marker profiles support a neuroprotective effect of erythropoietin in ischemic stroke patients.

Hannelore Ehrenreich, Anne Kästner, Karin Weissenborn, Jackson Streeter, Swetlana Sperling, Kevin K Wang, Hans Worthmann, Ronald L Hayes, Nico von Ahsen, Andreas Kastrup and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Elevated Serum Levels of NSE and S-100β Correlate with Increased Risk of Acute Cerebral Infarction in Asian Populations.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Editorial: Biomarkers in Neurology.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannelore EhrenreichClinical Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Göttingen, Germany. ehrenreich@em.mpg.de
Anne Kästner
Karin Weissenborn
Jackson Streeter
Swetlana Sperling
Kevin K Wang
Hans Worthmann
Ronald L Hayes
Nico von Ahsen
Andreas Kastrup
Andreas Jeromin
Manfred Herrmann
Banyan Biomarkers (United States) · USMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEKlinikum Bremen-Mitte · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The German Multicenter EPO Stroke Trial, which investigated safety and efficacy of erythropoietin (EPO) treatment in ischemic stroke, was formally declared a negative study. Exploratory subgroup analysis, however, revealed that patients not receiving thrombolysis most likely benefited from EPO during clinical recovery, a result demonstrated in the findings of the Göttingen EPO Stroke Study. The present work investigated whether the positive signal on clinical outcome in this patient subgroup was mirrored by respective poststroke biomarker profiles. All patients of the German Multicenter EPO Stroke Trial nonqualifying for thrombolysis were included if they (a) were treated per protocol and (b) had at least two of the five follow-up blood samples for circulating damage markers drawn (n = 163). The glial markers S100B and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) and the neuronal marker ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum on d 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 poststroke. All biomarkers increased poststroke. Overall, EPO-treated patients had significantly lower concentrations (area under the curve) over 7 d of observation, as reflected by the composite score of all three markers (Cronbach α = 0.811) and by UCH-L1. S100B and GFAP showed a similar tendency. To conclude, serum biomarker profiles, as an outcome measure of brain damage, corroborate an advantageous effect of EPO in ischemic stroke. In particular, reduction in the neuronal damage marker UCH-L1 may reflect neuroprotection by EPO.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveBiomarkersBrain IschemiaEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinFemaleHumansMaleNeuroprotective AgentsRecombinant ProteinsStrokeTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinNeuroprotective AgentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21912808
PMCPMC3321813
OpenAlexW2208350408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.