Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21912442›Full record

ArticleThe Clinical biochemist. Reviews2011

Molecular diagnosis of duchenne muscular dystrophy: past, present and future in relation to implementing therapies.

Nigel G Laing, Mark R Davis, Klair Bayley, Sue Fletcher, Steve D Wilton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Clinical biochemist. Reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CRISPR/Cas correction of muscular dystrophies.Experimental cell research · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The frontiers of sequencing in undiagnosed neurodevelopmental diseases.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Effect of Ataluren on dystrophin mutations.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. CUGC for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nigel G LaingCentre for Medical Research, University of Western Australia M519, Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Nedlands, WA 6009;
Mark R Davis
Klair Bayley
Sue Fletcher
Steve D Wilton
Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the commonest and best-known of the muscular dystrophies. Being an X-linked disorder, it affects mainly boys. The disease gene was identified in 1987, with the majority of mutations demonstrated to be large-scale deletions. Current best practice molecular diagnosis includes multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) followed by direct sequencing of all exons at the genomic level, or from cDNA, in order to detect point and other small mutations. The difference between DMD and the allelic Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is whether the precise mutation in the gene is a null mutation or results in a modified still partially functional protein. Over the last few years, significant progress has been made in moving experimental therapies into clinical trials, with one of the most promising possible therapies being anti-sense oligonucleotide induced exon-skipping, which converts DMD to BMD. In order to maximise the benefit from future therapies, it will be necessary to start administering the therapies as early as possible in the life of the affected boys, before significant muscle loss occurs. This will require early diagnosis, which evidence suggests is best achieved through population screening. Population screening also allows the avoidance of multiple affected boys in families with no previous family history.

Identifiers

PMID21912442
PMCPMC3157948
OpenAlexW2116043246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.