Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21910885›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks.

Ting Hu, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong, Jeff W Kiralis, Angeline S Andrew, Margaret R Karagas, Jason H Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting HuDepartment of Genetics, Dartmouth Medical School, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong
Jeff W Kiralis
Angeline S Andrew
Margaret R Karagas
Jason H Moore
Dartmouth College · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USDartmouth Psychiatric Research Center · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
VARIATION IN BIOACCUMULATION AND BIOMAGNIFICATION OF METALS IN NORTHERN US LAKESP42ES007373 · NIEHS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STANTON, BRUCE A. · 1995 to 2019
$52.0M
THE ROLE OF CAL IN CIF-MEDIATED DEGRADATION OF CFTRP20RR018787 · NCRR · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STANTON, BRUCE A. · 2003 to 2011
$21.9M
NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN NEW HAMPSHIRER01CA057494 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI KARAGAS, MARGARET RITA · 1993 to 2015
$10.9M
Quantitative Biology Research InstituteP20GM103534 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2012 to 2016
$8.6M
Bioinformatics Strategies for Genome-Wide Association StudiesR01LM010098 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H., WILLIAMS, SCOTT MATTHEW · 2009 to 2023
$5.1M
Bioinformatics Strategies: Biodefense Vaccine ResearchR01AI059694 · NIAID · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2004 to 2012
$4.5M
Machine Learning Prediction of Cancer SusceptibilityR01LM009012 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2006 to 2014
$3.3M
QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTEP20RR024475 · NCRR · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2011 to 2011
$2.3M
Comprehensive Assessment of Bladder Cancer Genetic SusceptibilityR03CA121382 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ANDREW, ANGELINE SANDERSON · 2006 to 2007
$158k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA057494NCI NIH HHS R01-CA57494NCI NIH HHS R03 CA121382NCI NIH HHS R03-CA121382NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR018787NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024475NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI059694NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI59694NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007373NIEHS NIH HHS P42-ES007373NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103534NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009012NLM NIH HHS R01-LM009012NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010098NLM NIH HHS R01-LM010098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpistasis is recognized ubiquitous in the genetic architecture of complex traits such as disease susceptibility. Experimental studies in model organisms have revealed extensive evidence of biological interactions among genes. Meanwhile, statistical and computational studies in human populations have suggested non-additive effects of genetic variation on complex traits. Although these studies form a baseline for understanding the genetic architecture of complex traits, to date they have only considered interactions among a small number of genetic variants. Our goal here is to use network science to determine the extent to which non-additive interactions exist beyond small subsets of genetic variants. We infer statistical epistasis networks to characterize the global space of pairwise interactions among approximately 1500 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning nearly 500 cancer susceptibility genes in a large population-based study of bladder cancer.

resultsThe statistical epistasis network was built by linking pairs of SNPs if their pairwise interactions were stronger than a systematically derived threshold. Its topology clearly differentiated this real-data network from networks obtained from permutations of the same data under the null hypothesis that no association exists between genotype and phenotype. The network had a significantly higher number of hub SNPs and, interestingly, these hub SNPs were not necessarily with high main effects. The network had a largest connected component of 39 SNPs that was absent in any other permuted-data networks. In addition, the vertex degrees of this network were distinctively found following an approximate power-law distribution and its topology appeared scale-free.

conclusionsIn contrast to many existing techniques focusing on high main-effect SNPs or models of several interacting SNPs, our network approach characterized a global picture of gene-gene interactions in a population-based genetic data. The network was built using pairwise interactions, and its distinctive network topology and large connected components indicated joint effects in a large set of SNPs. Our observations suggested that this particular statistical epistasis network captured important features of the genetic architecture of bladder cancer that have not been described previously.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultAgedGenotypeHumansMiddle AgedNew HampshireUrinary Bladder Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21910885
PMCPMC3215301
OpenAlexW2030628077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.