ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011
Characterizing genetic interactions in human disease association studies using statistical epistasis networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transferring entropy to the realm of GxG interactions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018Pooled it
- Pathway-based genetic analysis of preterm birth.Genomics · 2013Pooled it
- Turning heterogeneity of statistical epistasis networks to an advantage.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Gene and pathway analysis of genome-wide genetic associations of bladder cancer.Current urology · 2025Article
- Distinct network patterns emerge from Cartesian and XOR epistasis models: a comparative network science analysis.BioData mining · 2024Article
- Heterogeneous network approaches to protein pathway prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Synergistic Epistasis and Systems Biology Approaches to Uncover a Pharmacogenomic Map Linked to Pain, Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulating Agents (PAIma) in a Healthy Cohort.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2024Article
- Distinct Network Patterns Emerge from Cartesian and XOR Epistasis Models: A Comparative Network Science Analysis.Research square · 2024Article
- NSPA: characterizing the disease association of multiple genetic interactions at single-subject resolution.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- A systematic analysis of gene-gene interaction in multiple sclerosis.BMC medical genomics · 2022Article
- Detecting gene-gene interactions from GWAS using diffusion kernel principal components.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Role of germline variants in the metastasis of breast carcinomas.Oncotarget · 2022Article
- Genetic interactions effects for cancer disease identification using computational models: a review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021Review
- Article
- An Early Stage Researcher's Primer on Systems Medicine Terminology.Network and systems medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- A Framework for Efficient N-Way Interaction Testing in Case/Control Studies With Categorical Data.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Gene-Environment Interaction: A Variable Selection Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Gene-set Enrichment with Mathematical Biology (GEMB).GigaScience · 2020Article
- Information Theory in Computational Biology: Where We Stand Today.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpistasis is recognized ubiquitous in the genetic architecture of complex traits such as disease susceptibility. Experimental studies in model organisms have revealed extensive evidence of biological interactions among genes. Meanwhile, statistical and computational studies in human populations have suggested non-additive effects of genetic variation on complex traits. Although these studies form a baseline for understanding the genetic architecture of complex traits, to date they have only considered interactions among a small number of genetic variants. Our goal here is to use network science to determine the extent to which non-additive interactions exist beyond small subsets of genetic variants. We infer statistical epistasis networks to characterize the global space of pairwise interactions among approximately 1500 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) spanning nearly 500 cancer susceptibility genes in a large population-based study of bladder cancer.
resultsThe statistical epistasis network was built by linking pairs of SNPs if their pairwise interactions were stronger than a systematically derived threshold. Its topology clearly differentiated this real-data network from networks obtained from permutations of the same data under the null hypothesis that no association exists between genotype and phenotype. The network had a significantly higher number of hub SNPs and, interestingly, these hub SNPs were not necessarily with high main effects. The network had a largest connected component of 39 SNPs that was absent in any other permuted-data networks. In addition, the vertex degrees of this network were distinctively found following an approximate power-law distribution and its topology appeared scale-free.
conclusionsIn contrast to many existing techniques focusing on high main-effect SNPs or models of several interacting SNPs, our network approach characterized a global picture of gene-gene interactions in a population-based genetic data. The network was built using pairwise interactions, and its distinctive network topology and large connected components indicated joint effects in a large set of SNPs. Our observations suggested that this particular statistical epistasis network captured important features of the genetic architecture of bladder cancer that have not been described previously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.