Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21910883›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Integrating GPCR-specific information with full text articles.

Bas Vroling, David Thorne, Philip McDermott, Teresa K Attwood, Gert Vriend, Steve Pettifer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Alpha-bulges in G protein-coupled receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Drug design for ever, from hype to hope.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bas VrolingCMBI, NCMLS, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 26-28, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
David Thorne
Philip McDermott
Teresa K Attwood
Gert Vriend
Steve Pettifer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the continued growth in the volume both of experimental G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) data and of the related peer-reviewed literature, the ability of GPCR researchers to keep up-to-date is becoming increasingly curtailed.

resultsWe present work that integrates the biological data and annotations in the GPCR information system (GPCRDB) with next-generation methods for intelligently exploring, visualising and interacting with the scientific articles used to disseminate them. This solution automatically retrieves relevant information from GPCRDB and displays it both within and as an adjunct to an article.

conclusionsThis approach allows researchers to extract more knowledge more swiftly from literature. Importantly, it allows reinterpretation of data in articles published before GPCR structure data became widely available, thereby rescuing these valuable data from long-dormant sources.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinPeriodicals as TopicReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAnimalsData MiningHumansInformation SystemsReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID21910883
PMCPMC3179973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.