Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21910630›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genetics2011

Uncovering the mystery of gliding motility in the myxobacteria.

Beiyan Nan, David R Zusman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chiral gliding: Right-handed navigation of filamentous cyanobacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Milestones in the development ofJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Beiyan NanDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. zusman@berkeley.edu
David R Zusman

Funding

SENSORY TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT IN A BACTERIUMR01GM020509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ZUSMAN, DAVID ROBERT · 1985 to 2014
$5.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM020509NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial gliding motility is the smooth movement of cells on solid surfaces unaided by flagella or pili. Many diverse groups of bacteria exhibit gliding, but the mechanism of gliding motility has remained a mystery since it was first observed more than a century ago. Recent studies on the motility of Myxococcus xanthus, a soil myxobacterium, suggest a likely mechanism for gliding in this organism. About forty M. xanthus genes were shown to be involved in gliding motility, and some of their protein products were labeled and localized within cells. These studies suggest that gliding motility in M. xanthus involves large multiprotein structural complexes, regulatory proteins, and cytoskeletal filaments. In this review, we summarize recent experiments that provide the basis for this emerging view of M. xanthus motility. We also discuss alternative models for gliding.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAdenosine TriphosphateBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsFlagellaFocal AdhesionsModels, BiologicalMolecular Motor ProteinsMovementMultiprotein ComplexesMyxococcus xanthusSecretory PathwayAdenosine TriphosphateBacterial ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsMglA protein, Myxococcus xanthusMolecular Motor ProteinsMultiprotein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID21910630
PMCPMC3397683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.