Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21910078›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2012

Interaction of ricin and Shiga toxins with ribosomes.

Nilgun E Tumer, Xiao-Ping Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins.Engineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Prophage and Us-Shiga Toxin Phages Revisited.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein Toxins That Utilize Gangliosides as Host Receptors.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nilgun E TumerDepartment of Plant Biology and Pathology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, 59 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520, USA. tumer@aesop.rutgers.edu
Xiao-Ping Li
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

What makes ricin ToxicR01AI072425 · NIAID · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI TUMER, NILGUN E · 2007 to 2021
$5.8M
Optimization of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Shiga and Ricin ToxinsU01AI082120 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PANG, YUAN-PING · 2009 to 2012
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI072425NIAID NIH HHS AI082120NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072425NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI082120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ricin and Shiga toxins designated as ribosome inactivating proteins (RIPs) are RNA N-glycosidases that depurinate a specific adenine (A₄₃₂₄ in rat 28S rRNA) in the conserved α-sarcin/ricin loop of the large rRNA, inhibiting protein synthesis. Evidence obtained from a number of studies suggests that interaction with ribosomal proteins plays an important role in the catalytic activity and ribosome specificity of RIPs. This review summarizes the recent developments in identification of the ribosomal proteins that interact with ricin and Shiga toxins and the principles governing these interactions.

Indexed as

Enzyme ActivationProtein BindingRibosomal ProteinsRibosome Inactivating ProteinsRibosomesRicinShiga ToxinsRibosomal ProteinsRibosome Inactivating ProteinsRicinShiga Toxins

Identifiers

PMID21910078
PMCPMC4103753
OpenAlexW1590483577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.