Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21910001›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2012

Osteochondral tissue engineering approaches for articular cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration.

Silvia Panseri, Alessandro Russo, Carla Cunha, Alice Bondi, Alessandro Di Martino, Silvia Patella, Elizaveta Kon

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Bone Healing.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toward zonally tailored scaffolds for osteochondral differentiation of synovial mesenchymal stem cells.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Progress in three-dimensional printing with growth factors.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia PanseriLaboratory of Nano-Biotechnology, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy. s.panseri@biomec.ior.it
Alessandro Russo
Carla Cunha
Alice Bondi
Alessandro Di Martino
Silvia Patella
Elizaveta Kon
Orthopedic Institute · USIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsteochondral defects (i.e., defects which affect both the articular cartilage and underlying subchondral bone) are often associated with mechanical instability of the joint and therefore with the risk of inducing osteoarthritic degenerative changes. This review addresses the current surgical treatments and most promising tissue engineering approaches for articular cartilage and subchondral bone regeneration.

methodsThe capability to repair osteochondral or bone defects remains a challenging goal for surgeons and researchers. So far, most clinical approaches have been shown to have limited capacity to treat severe lesions. Current surgical repair strategies vary according to the nature and size of the lesion and the preference of the operating surgeon. Tissue engineering has emerged as a promising alternative strategy that essentially develops viable substitutes capable of repairing or regenerating the functions of damaged tissue.

resultsAn overview of novel and most promising osteochondroconductive scaffolds, osteochondroinductive signals, osteochondrogenic precursor cells, and scaffold fixation approaches are presented addressing advantages, drawbacks, and future prospectives for osteochondral regenerative medicine.

conclusionTissue engineering has emerged as an excellent approach for the repair and regeneration of damaged tissue, with the potential to circumvent all the limitations of autologous and allogeneic tissue repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review, Level III.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationTissue ScaffoldsBone and BonesCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesGuided Tissue RegenerationHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsJointsKnee InjuriesOrthopedic ProceduresStem Cell TransplantationSuture TechniquesTissue EngineeringIntercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21910001
OpenAlexW2083241886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.