Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909974›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2011

The cochlear CRF signaling systems and their mechanisms of action in modulating cochlear sensitivity and protection against trauma.

Christine E Graham, Johnvesly Basappa, Sevin Turcan, Douglas E Vetter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lateral olivocochlear neurons modulate cochlear responses to noise exposure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christine E GrahamJean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Johnvesly Basappa
Sevin Turcan
Douglas E Vetter
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Investigations into the mouse olivocochlear systemR01DC006258 · NIDCD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI VETTER, DOUGLAS E · 2004 to 2008
$1.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006258NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC006258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key requirement for encoding the auditory environment is the ability to dynamically alter cochlear sensitivity. However, merely attaining a steady state of maximal sensitivity is not a viable solution since the sensory cells and ganglion cells of the cochlea are prone to damage following exposure to loud sound. Most often, such damage is via initial metabolic insult that can lead to cellular death. Thus, establishing the highest sensitivity must be balanced with protection against cellular metabolic damage that can lead to loss of hair cells and ganglion cells, resulting in loss of frequency representation. While feedback mechanisms are known to exist in the cochlea that alter sensitivity, they respond only after stimulus encoding, allowing potentially damaging sounds to impact the inner ear at times coincident with increased sensitivity. Thus, questions remain concerning the endogenous signaling systems involved in dynamic modulation of cochlear sensitivity and protection against metabolic stress. Understanding endogenous signaling systems involved in cochlear protection may lead to new strategies and therapies for prevention of cochlear damage and consequent hearing loss. We have recently discovered a novel cochlear signaling system that is molecularly equivalent to the classic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. This cochlear HPA-equivalent system functions to balance auditory sensitivity and susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss, and also protects against cellular metabolic insults resulting from exposures to ototoxic drugs. We review the anatomy, physiology, and cellular signaling of this system, and compare it to similar signaling in other organs/tissues of the body.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory ThresholdCochleaConnexinsCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseHair Cells, AuditoryHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemPituitary-Adrenal SystemReceptors, AMPAReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneSignal TransductionUrocortinsConnexinsCorticotropin-Releasing HormoneGlutamate-Ammonia Ligaseglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 4Receptors, AMPAReceptors, Corticotropin-Releasing HormoneUrocortins

Identifiers

PMID21909974
PMCPMC3251519
OpenAlexW2035689467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.