Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909796›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2011

[What's new in lung pathology: minutes from the Pulmonary Pathology Working Group of the German Society of Pathology].

I Petersen, P A Schnabel

Abstract readConference Proceedings
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Not Available].Der Pathologe · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

I PetersenInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Ziegelmühlenweg 1, 07740, Jena, Deutschland. iver.petersen@med.uni-jena.de
P A Schnabel
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pulmonary pathology working group was founded in 2008 and has been officially active since the 93(rd) Freiburg DGP ("Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pathologie", German Society of Pathology) congress in 2009. It is based on the competence and activity of its members who elect the board, the chair, and its vice chair. Both are responsible for the organization of the sessions at the annual DGP congress in the spring and a meeting in the fall. The vice chair will replace the chair after one year. The working group concentrates on scientific issues and topics relevant for daily practice, including solutions to specific diagnostic cases. This article highlights the history of the working group, the pulmonary sessions at the 95(th) DGP congress in Leipzig 2011, and future activities. New results for lung cancer from whole genome sequencing are addressed. Specifically, recent data is presented on FGFR1 amplification, DDR2 mutation, and EML4-ALK fusion, the role of non-coding RNA, cell adhesion, the cytoskeleton, as well as the problem of subtyping of lung tumors in cytology.

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID21909796
OpenAlexW2414857461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.