Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909794›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2011

[Precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix: morphology and molecular pathology].

L-C Horn, K Klostermann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L-C HornInstitut für Pathologie, Abteilung Mamma-, Gynäko- & Perinatalpathologie, Department für Diagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 26, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. hornl@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
K Klostermann
University Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HPV-induced alterations of the uterine cervix are frequently biopsied because of suspicious findings on a Pap smear and/or colposcopy. Precancerous lesions occur at the so called transformation zone. For those representing squamous differentiation, the traditional three-tier grading system in CIN 1 to 3 is used. CIN 1 and CIN 2 represent (spontaneous) regression in 60-90% and 50%, respectively. In CIN 3 lesions progression is seen in 20-50%. For appropriate grading, improvement of inter- and intraobserver correlation as well as the exclusion of non-precancerous lesions, p16 immunohistochemistry might be helpful. The terms endocervical glandular dysplasia and low-grade glandular intraepithelial neoplasia have been suggested for glandular lesions less than adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). Until now reproducible histological criteria have not been established. Additional studies using HPV analysis, p16 and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry have not been proved for these lesions. In accordance with international consensus meetings, these diagnostic terms are not recommended for use in practice. AIS, characterised by the replacement of glandular epithelium by cytologically malignant cells, has been established as the precancerous lesion of the endocervix. AIS is much less common than CIN 3 with a reported range of 1:50-100. But, AIS is found in association with CIN 3 with 25-75%. The differential diagnosis between AIS and non-neoplastic glandular lesion may be aided by immunohistochemistry (e.g. p16, Ki-67, bcl-2, vimentin). All specimens obtained after the clinical diagnosis of cervical precancerous lesions should be examined using step sectioning to rule out microinvasive growth. Important information for clinicians includes the quality of the specimen (cautery artefacts, transformation zone enclosed within the probe), exact grading of CIN lesions, identification of other lesions responsible for suspicious findings of a Pap smear or at colposcopy, and in the case of conisation the distance of the lesion from the resection margins (endo- and ectocervical and circumferential margin).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCell Transformation, NeoplasticCervix UteriColposcopyFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPrecancerous ConditionsPrognosisUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID21909794
OpenAlexW2172868365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.