Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909743›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2011

[Non-pharmacologic measures in pain therapy. Application in 25 German hospitals].

A Ewers, N Nestler, E Pogatzki-Zahn, Z Bauer, H Richter, J Osterbrink

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A EwersParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Institut für Pflegewissenschaft, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich. andre.ewers@pmu.ac.at
N Nestler
E Pogatzki-Zahn
Z Bauer
H Richter
J Osterbrink

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of non-pharmacologic therapy (NPT) within pain therapy increases patient satisfaction and is, in addition to pharmacologic methods, recommended in the National Expert Standard on Pain Management in Nursing of the German Network of Quality Development in Nursing. If and to what extent non-pharmacologic methods are applied within pain therapy in German hospitals has as yet been unknown. MATERIALS AND

methodsWithin the project "Pain-Free Hospital" 2,840 nurses in 25 hospitals were interviewed via questionnaire forms and oral interviews about the use of NPT.

resultsOf the nurses 80% confirmed the use of NPT. The majority of the interviewed nurses applied superficial cold, bedding and heat for pain relief. We identified barriers to the implementation of NPT, such as the scarce knowledge of nurses about these therapeutic areas and the uncertainty whether NPT needs to be described by doctors or not.

conclusionSome of the NPTs are well established in hospitals. For nationwide use of NPT their systematic training and implementation is necessary.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationComplementary TherapiesCooperative BehaviorEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMaleNaturopathyNursing Staff, HospitalPainPain ManagementPain MeasurementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.