ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2011
[The German version of parents' postoperative pain measure (PPPM-D). Validation on children 2-12 years old].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and Validity of the Swedish Version of the Parents' Postoperative Pain Measure (PPPM-S): A Cross-Sectional Psychometric Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- High dose ibuprofen as a monotherapy on an around-the-clock basis fails to control pain in children undergoing tonsil surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParents become increasingly more responsible for the postoperative pain management of their children. Useful and valid pain assessments for parents may improve pain measurement. The aim of this study was to evaluate a German version of the parents' postoperative pain measure (PPPM-D).
methodsAfter translation of the PPPM into German 52 children between 2 and 12 years of age, undergoing orthopedic and trauma surgery, were included in a prospective study. At least one of the parents completed the PPPM-D on the preoperative day and the day of surgery until postoperative day 5. Both, the children's and infants postoperative pain scale (CHIPPS) for children between 2 and 4 years and the faces pain scale revised (FPS-R) for children between 5 and 12 years were also assessed. Moreover, the acceptance of the PPPM-D by the parents was assessed.
resultsThe PPPM-D showed satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's α values = 0.77-0.87). Construct validity was demonstrated with strong correlations with the CHIPPS and the FPS-R. Discriminative validity was shown by both statistically and clinically significant differences between minor, medial and major surgeries on the first 3 days after surgery. The examination of sensitivity to change yielded promising results. The PPPM-D was well accepted by the participating parents.
conclusionsThe results of this study provide evidence of the reliability, validity and high acceptance of the PPPM-D as an assessment tool of postoperative pain among children aged 2 through to 12 years of age after orthopedic or trauma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.