Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21909685›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2012

Wilms tumor-1, claudin-1 and ezrin are useful immunohistochemical markers that help to distinguish schwannoma from fibroblastic meningioma.

Avninder Singh, Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Kris Ylaya, Stephen M Hewitt, Karam Chand Sharma, Sunita Saxena

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Claudin proteins, outside-in signaling, and carcinogenesis.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2017
    Review
  6. Nasopalpebral Schwannomas and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2016
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Avninder SinghSafdarjung Hospital Campus, National Institute of Pathology (ICMR), Room 602, 6th floor, New Delhi, 110029, India. dravninder@yahoo.co.in
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
Kris Ylaya
Stephen M Hewitt
Karam Chand Sharma
Sunita Saxena
Safdarjang Hospital · INNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institute of Pathology · INNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Tissue Array Research ProgramZICBC010923 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HEWITT, STEPHEN · 2009 to 2014
$4.7M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIC BC010923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify immunohistochemical (IHC) markers that can reliably separate schwannoma (SCHW) and fibroblastic meningioma (FM). We selected 106 cases of intracranial SCHW (n = 56) and FM (n = 50) and constructed a tissue microarray (TMA) of core diameter of 1.0 mm from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. A TMA-IHC was performed using 14 antibodies. After IHC staining, 98 cores were found suitable for evaluation. The IHC staining was scored as 0-2+ (0, negative; 1+, weak and/or focal 2+ strong and/or diffuse positive). A discriminant analysis (DA) (Wilks'Lambda test) was performed to assess the relative importance of these biomarkers in classifying the two groups FM and SCHW. It showed that WT-1 (Wilks'λ 0.085, p < 0.001), EMA (Wilks'λ 0.253, p < 0.001), S100 (Wilks'λ 0.487, p < 0.001), Claudin-1 (Wilks' λ 0.57, p < 0.001) and Ezrin (Wilks'λ 0.656, p < 0.001), SPARC (Wilks'λ 0.751, p < 0.01), NP-Y (Wilks'λ, 0.819, p < 0.001) and EGFR (Wilks'λ 0.845, p = 0.026) were some of the statistically significant markers that discriminated SCHW and FM. For sensitivity and specificity for SCHW the significant markers [Area under the curve (95% CI), p-value] by ROC analysis were WT-1 [0.990(0.000, 1.000), <0.001], S100 [0.880(0.808, 0.951), <0.001] while for diagnosing FM the most sensitive and specific markers were EMA [0.957(0.914, 1.000), <. 001], Claudin-1 [0.857(0.782, 0.932), <0.001] and ezrin [0.792(0.700,0.884),<0.001]. WT-1, Claudin-1 and Ezrin may be potentially useful immunohistochemical adjuncts to EMA and S100 that differentiate SCHW from FM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorClaudin-1Cytoskeletal ProteinsDiagnosis, DifferentialEzrinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMaleMembrane ProteinsMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaBiomarkers, TumorClaudin-1CLDN1 protein, humanCytoskeletal ProteinsEzrinMembrane ProteinsMucin-1S100 ProteinsWT1 Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21909685
PMCPMC7457566
OpenAlexW2025237897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.